Science Corner

So there's an astronomer's convention in Prague and one of the hot topics of debate is how should a planet be defined. The debate centers squarely on Pluto. One side considers Pluto a planet while the other side does not. If Pluto is a planet, then there are three other space bodies that will immediately be labeled as planets as well. However, this would define a planet as "any object larger than 500 miles in diameter that orbits the sun, has a mass roughly one-12,000th that of Earth and has enough self-gravity to pull itself into a round shape." Critics point out that this definition would most likely add other bodies and asteriods in our solar system.

Now, I understand I am thoroughly unqualified to opine on this debate. Nevertheless, my voice on the subject must be heard for I bring a Colbert level of truthiness!

I am totally with the side that wants to kick Pluto out of the planets clique. First of all, Pluto is smaller than our moon. And B, Pluto's so called moon Charon is roughly as big Pluto. Parte tres, Pluto and Charon both orbit a point in space that is between them ... they basically revolve around each other. Anyway, I just had to bring the truthiness out and call Pluto on its planet imposter status.

And now for your reading pleasure, a conversation overheard at the convention:


Astronomer #1: So I hear you consider Pluto to be a planet.

Astronomer #2: That's right. It's a round shape, at least 500 miles in diameter, and has an orbit.

Astronomer #1: Hmmm, is that right?

Astronomer #2: Oh, you betcha.

Astronomer #1: Well my balls are 500 miles in diameter and they orbit Uranus but you don't see me trying to get them labeled as planets, do ya?

Astronomer #2: Very clever butt-munch.

FIN

I have discovered ...

The greatest television show in the world! It is ... "House MD" ... lol. Okay it's not the greatest, that title belongs to "The X-Files" (let's not argue people), but it is still pretty damn good. It's a refreshing, different take on a medical drama (especially when compared to ER, Chicago Hope, Grey's Anatomy, etc); the medical mystery makes for an intriguing plot. And I must admit the smarmy, arrogant, caustic Gregory House character (as played by the wonderful Hugh Laurie) makes for a very dynamic, always interesting show. I've only seen a handful of reruns on the USA network, but I am hooked and hopefully I can catch the previous seasons this way. Anyway, if any of you out are curious about "House MD" but have yet to view an episode, do yourself a favor and catch the next viewing ... you'll definitely enjoy it.

Media Test -- Updated

So last week I had a post entitled "Media Test" which linked to this internet video.

After viewing the video I asked the question: "Is this vid laughing at or laughing with preppies?"

Anyway, the point of the post was to run a little media literacy test because I strongly feel the video is BOTH laughing AT and laughing WITH preppies. And it is doing this because of the fact it is a marketing tool by the Smirnoff company for their new beverage "Raw Tea".

While I admit the mock video is funny (it has its moments), it seems rather sneaky and disingenuous for a multi-million dollar corporation to put together a slick mock music video commercial and try to pass it off as the product of some anonymous group (college kids or stand-ups or etc) who then uploaded the vid to the web. While Smirnoff is named numerous times in the video, there's no official logo or trademark to give the impression that the video is actually a commercial.

Now I understand most people will find this to be no big deal because we are bombarded by advertisements all the time. I think because we're already bombed with ads, it is important to know when we are watching something whose aim is truly comic or satiric and when we are watching something whose aim is commercial.

Which brings me to my last point. Is the vid really satiric? I personally do not think so. While the whole "preppie" as "gangsta" act is funny, as far as I can tell they both like to rap about their riches. The preppie rap lyrics go on to point out their "Ivy League education" and that their parents run the nation. And the video's "female talent" are basically interchangeable with any rap video --- the attire is the only difference. So while at first glance this may seem like a slight dig at preppies acting like gangstas, there's enough here to knowingly laugh with the type of preppies being portrayed. Now I'd like to point out here that being "preppie" isn't some kind of evil or bad thing or that every "preppie" likes to brag about being rich and feels their "kind" run the nation. It is just that this vid is doing both, laughing AT and WITH preppies.

Which I have to admit is excellent, sneaky, manipulative advertising.

What do they say about female drivers?

So if you're not a big sports fan there's a lovely young lady racing cars in the IRL. Her name is Danica Patrick and while she hasn't won a race she has won a pole, a top five finish, and rookie of the year. She's easy on the eyes and has done an FHM spread or cover, as well as a couple slightly cheesecake commercials selling car fluids or something --- all I remember from the commercials is her pouty, "did someone fart?" look into the camera, lol.

Anyway, while Danica has made many female firsts in the IRL, winning a pole was not one of them. That's because Sarah Fisher did that back in 2002. While Sarah is pretty, she doesn't have the model figure and good looks of Danica. And perhaps that's a reason why she didn't receive the same hype as Danica. Sarah's 4 year stint in the IRL ended in 2004 as she tried to make the move to NASCAR. Recently Sarah returned to race in the IRL on an open-contract for a race or two. There's talk she will return to the IRL for the 2007 season.

Anyway, the reason I am posting about this is not simply because it seems a bit unfair society/sports media/IRL fans went bat-guano insane for Danica while only going semi-crazy for Sarah (specifically in hype and funding). I'm posting because it seems the sports media is ready to ignite a feud between the two. Take for example this article (from which I have borrow quite a bit of info) which has no problem fanning the flames. However, there's a quote from Danica in 2004 (before Danica entered the IRL) which is hard to ignore: "[Fisher has] done some good things, but then there are some bad things. Like, she struggles, I think, with the racing part of it."

That's right folks, what a beeyaa--not a very nice person. I have no idea if Danica has apologized for that comment but whatever, it was a bad thing to say. I'm sure Sarah had plenty of men questioning her ability but for another female driver to do so, and one who had yet to enter the IRL at the time, it's enough to bring about hair-pulling fisticuffs. I kid, I kid, on the hair-pulling.

Anyway, while an IRL feud between two female drivers may seem a bit sexist (how many times will we hear "catfight" in articles), it might bring in a crapload of viewers. And as many have mentioned, one of NASCAR's popularity is the soap-operatic, at times petty squabbling between its drivers. And let's face it, NASCAR is pretty damn popular.

So I think these two ladies should start a running feud and try to get the better of each other on the track next season. Perhaps Team Sarah and Team Danica shirts are to follow.

Random Stuff

So the other day Yahoo! News had a headline about men signing up for "Charm School" in order to woo the ladies. It's a curious read that doesn't really say much, but how can one not read about a "Charm School" (with a theory of attraction, no less --- though never explained) ... anyway, here's the link.

And for the record I was thinking about signing up but then I read how much it cost ... $1600 dollars. So I have a different plan. I'll take $1600 dollars and put it into my wallet. Then I'll head to a busy club and nonchalantly take out my now bulky wallet and act like I'm thumbing through it for something. The women and the gays will be on my like stupid on George Allen. Umm, because the women and the gays like money. Zing! Oh man, I'm so high-larious. Oh wait, I don't want the gays on me. Okay maybe I haven't thought this through.

Hah, I'm just joking around ladies. Saying women and the gays are only into money is a sexist stereotype. And as a proud feminist I would never do such a thing. Instead I'll tell women I'm sensitive, yet strong and that I watch "Grey's Anatomy". Lol.

For the record, I know of a few dudes that are so into money they actually gold dig (for lack of another term). This world is weird people, weird!

Anyway, TRANSFORMERS the live-action/CGI movie will be coming out next year. Michael Bay is the director so this might be crappy (I just checked out the writers and things don't seem good, though if this does turn out well it's good news for trekkies as this writing team is slated to write the next Trek film). Anyway, they have a teaser trailer up on the official website which doesn't really show much at all. But if you'd like to check it out here's the link.

Also, if you could help me out and leave a comment on the "Media Test" post below I would really appreciate it. Thanks!

Media Test

Step 1 - Go view this web vid at youtube.

Step 2 - Please answer the following question:

"Is this vid laughing at or laughing with preppies?"

My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard

I apologize for unleashing this upon you ... but alas ... I must.

http://pokeshake.ytmnd.com/

AOL users are weird

So the other day some AOL employees posted a data set of nearly 37 million individual searches (made by about 650,000 members). That averages to like 56 searches per member. I'm not sure if 56 search entries can paint a picture of the user, but I'm sure it's fun trying. Anyway, Paul Boutin over at Slate has used the software of the startup company he works for to go over the searches and come up with 7 amorphous profiles. It's a very curious and interesting (and funny) read.

I guess I'm an Omnivore though I'm not sure that fits entirely because the majority of my searches are for film related sites. Anyway, it is a fun read. Click already!

Blog Out! - Non-Fiction

While I have a healthy books-to-read list (I'm currently on RIGHT AS RAIN by G. Pelecanos) I'm always on the lookout to add to the list. Thanks to a recent "Fresh Air "on NPR I came across The Wonga Coup by Adam Roberts. Here's a Seattle Times review of the book.

If you enjoy political and military thrillers, how about a non-fiction account of the attempted coup of the small African nation Equatorial Guinea ... by a group of about 100 Mercenaries employed by a group of well-to-do British/South African citizens. Yeah, when this story first broke in 2004 I had to do a double take on the Yahoo! News headline. From the few news articles I've read and the wonderful interview with author Adam Roberts on "Fresh Air" I've come to understand that the planners of the attempted coup basically considered it a get-even-richer scheme. The basic idea was to plant a native figurehead and stealthily steal the small nation's rich oil profits. The details and results of this ignominious exercise in arrogance and narcissism are interesting, laughable, and entertaining all at the same time. I hope I snag this book sooner than later ... it is going to make for one hell-of-a read.

SLEEPY HOLLOW (1999)

Do you have a netflix queue? If you don't you should get one. Anyway I have one (as does your Grandma Ilene, so maybe you should look into one) and it's filled with a gazillion flicks I needed to see like yesterday. I'm pretty good with adding new films because they get advertised on the tele (hmm, first "queue" now "tele" --- the Brits are coming for their language ... I say over the center of my discolored dead body). But films from the past decade which I wanted to see when they first debuted but simply missed and now forgotten about ... well those films are a bit harder to queue up. However they do come on cable tv. Now I should really rent these films from netflix because tv shreds 10+ minutes to squeeze in enough commercials. But then I may simply forget again and let's face it, I can't say no to a good film. Which brings me to this lovely gem:

SLEEPY HOLLOW (1999)

Rating: ****1/2 out of 5

This gothic horror mystery simply has it all: a thrillingly entertaining plot, wonderfully creepy sets, superb acting, and a sprinkle of comedy for good measure. New York Constable Ichabod Crane (Depp), who places science before spirits, is called to Sleepy Hollow to investigate murders at the hand of what the townsfolk describe as a Headless Horseman. The direction is outstanding. Tim Burton has a lot going on simply from the plot; he adds an interesting dreamscape backstory and juggles everything splendidly onscreen. The visuals are fantastic, from the mesmerizing still that introduces the titles to the eerie, foggy Hollow that is a character in its own right. The film is more than simply plot as screenwriter Andrew Kevin Walker pens several clever, charming, and comedic lines. And the two leads seem to have a majestic time uttering them. Johnny Depp’s idiosyncratic Crane is simply a joy to watch. This one should not be missed.

Blog Out! The Expansive Edition

So I'm looking forward to several flicks, tv shows, and books ... and I'm going to blog about it folks. Anyway, hopefully some (if not all) of you blog neighbors are looking forward to the same things and you'll happily comment your thoughts. Or drop a comment with upcoming things I've failed to mention that also look promising.

MIAMI VICE (2006) - I'm not sure if I forget or I just never knew, but director Michael Mann had a hand in creating the original "Miami Vice" tv series. I looked up the tv series on IMDb and found that Dick Wolf (producer/creator behind Law & Order) was a writer as was Daniel Sackheim (a veteran director of The X-Files and House, M.D.). Anyway, Mann is a very curious director for me because while he seems to always craft skilled, entertaining Hollywood thrillers, there's a realism and complexity to his films that most mainstream Hollywood movies lack. I'm not sure what to expect from MIAMI VICE the film, but I hope it's more than simple Hollywood fare.

"GREY'S ANATOMY" - I'm still on the fence with this show, lol. It's entertaining and enjoyable but sometimes I feel it isn't deep enough. Though maybe it doesn't want to be deep and simply enjoys its sporadic dives into middle waters. Whatever the case, the show is enjoyable and popular enough that it doesn't need my blessing, lol. I hope this fall it is able to hold viewership when it battles CSI (a show of which I have yet to see a literal minute of) on Thursdays. I have a feeling it won't work because the casual, non-core viewers will probably remain with CSI. But I hope I'm wrong and it does swimmingly (lol, what's with the water metaphors!??!?). Nevertheless, if it does flounder in the ratings I hope ABC quickly returns it to Sundays so that it can regain its momentum. If not, it could result in viewers abandoning the program, which would be a shame. Anyway, let's hope H-wood/ABC does the right thing.

"30 ROCK" - This seems to be NBC's gem of the fall, which had to be rescheduled from the Thursday slot when GA moved in. The more I hear about this (which isn't much), the more interested I get. It seems Tina Fey is a big creative force behind and in front of the camera and that's a plus in my book. Anyway, I'm looking forward to it ... I wonder if anyone else is or has heard much about it?

TALLADEGA NIGHTS (2006) - This looks high-larious. Has anyone been able to get a sneak peak viewing? This movie looks like the funniest thing in some time. "Whooooooooooooooo!"

I'm currently reading George Pelecanos's RIGHT AS RAIN which I should've finished some time ago. It's still great gritty, piercing crime/detective lit. If you're familiar with Pelecanos, you'll devour this book. And if you're not familiar, this is a great book to start getting familiar, heh.

Anyway, this should do it for now. I'll have a follow up post in a few days. Take care everyone.

KICKING & SCREAMING

I don't think I posted this review before, but if I did, my apologies. This movie is hilarious because of the star and the supporting cast. However, the forced 'lesson of day' that's tacked on is so irritating that I was kind of disappointed. Anyway, if you need a laugh and a family flick ... this is your movie.

KICKING & SCREAMING (2005)

Star Rating: ***1/2 out of 5

A light comedy/after-school special, this movie is worth viewing thanks to Will Ferrell and company. Ferrell plays a goofy, loving family man who doesn’t have the greatest relationship with his father (Duvall). It seems Duvall wanted a sports stud as a son and got an uncoordinated but amiable vitamin store owner. When Ferrell steps in to coach his own son’s soccer team (last place misfits, natch) he finds himself competing with his father who coaches the soccer league’s top team. Yes, the setup is predictable but it gives Ferrell a great open field in which to operate his comedic gold. And while this will never be the funniest Will Ferrell movie, there are enough solid laughs that you won’t be disappointed. There’s also a hokey lesson involved in the movie that seems so forced that it was simply stapled on. In the end, it’s a worthy family movie that will satisfy anyone under 15 and over 30. Oh yeah, Coach Ditka is a thief because he steals several scenes.

Blog Out!

Everyone can rejoice ... we found Leigh's blog. So Leigh had a blog and it vanished! I think it might have been employer related --- the Man, always keeping us down. Anyway maybe she just moved blog web addresses. I'm not really sure of the details, but here is her blog, please check it out. The current post should be on the front page of cuteoverload.com --- that's all I will say. Yes, the suspense is killing you --- click already:

Fleur de Leigh

A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE (2005)

Once again I have been lax in my updating duties; my apologies blog buds.

This next film is simply superb and my meagre review really does not do it justice. The thriller aspect of the film is crisply conducted and the dynamic characters at the heart of the story jump off the screen. The story will grip you and the film will challenge you on many levels.

A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE (2005)

Star Rating: ***** out of 5

A deep, thought-provoking masterpiece from an exceptional auteur. A small town diner owner (Viggo Mortensen) is mistaken for an underworld tough guy, leading to tense moments for his family and town. But is this really a case of mistaken identity? This is simply an intelligent film which asks much from the audience. Director David Cronenberg plays thoroughly with genre but it is not to manipulate the audience. In fact, he is challenging the audience and our preconceptions of the thriller genre. As the title suggests, violence is key and Cronenberg strives to show the gruesome results of real violence. But the film goes on to ask how important and necessary violence can be and whether or not violence can simply be an on/off switch, as it is in many movies. There’s also an incisive point about the attraction of violence, something we hardly own up to in popular culture. Cronenberg and company have crafted a marvelous piece of art in the mold of a terrific genre thriller. And this could not have been pulled off if the acting was not unbelieveably superb. Mortensen and Maria Bello (playing his wife) were clearly robbed of Oscar nominations. This film will stay with you for days, if not weeks ... it is simply that good. A film not to be missed.

SKY CAPTAIN ...

I can't believe it has been so long since I last posted. My apologies to the blog buddies out there. I will definitely try to post more often.

This next review is about a film I wanted to see when it first came out but simply missed it. I'm glad I finally caught up with it. Anyway, on to the review.

SKY CAPTAIN AND THE WORLD OF TOMORROW (2004)

Star rating: **** out of 5

A charming sci-fi flick with retro flair and gorgeous digital cinematography. The best way I can describe this movie is to say it’s one part aerial Indiana Jones, one part 1950's sci-fi, and one part romantic comedy. That’s right, perhaps the hidden gem of the movie is the funny, sparkling chemistry between the two leads (Jude Law and Gwenyth Paltrow). But this movie is first and foremost a visual spectacle. Virtually the entire film was digitally produced (except for the actors and certain portions of interior settings) and this results in a unique look not really seen before. It is a color noir that is almost congruent with the black and white film noirs of the 1940s and 1950s; the chiaroscuro lighting and the expressive use of shadow are front and center. Beyond the impressive visuals is a charming sci-fi adventure story that need not be taken so seriously, like the matinee serials the movie emulates. Nevertheless, the plot of mysterious robots attacking the globe’s major cities is a lot of fun and simply relax and watch as Sky Captain (Law) and intrepid reporter Polly Perkins (Paltrow) try to save the planet. This is a wonderful, stylish, and old school alternative to the explosion heavy, video game-like sci fi flicks we usually see. And in the end, if this type of movie has your curiosity piqued, I’d be willing to bet it charms you in the end.

10 Things ...

I caught this movie some time ago and had the review in stock, as I like to say, but forgot to post it. Anyway, I've always heard good things (mostly by the women folk) and I wasn't disappointed ... in fact I would say I was pleasantly surprised. I think you will be too.

10 THINGS I HATE ABOUT YOU (1999)

Star rating: **** out of 5

I can see why women go crazy for this flick. It's a sharp high school comedy with quite a bit of charm and a strong ending that'll get to even cynical romantics. Thanks to a kooky father, a sophomore (Larisa Oleynik) can date only when her older sister (Julia Stiles) dates. Unfortunately, the older sister is a cynical, sarcastic contrarian who feels the boys at their school are all idiotic miscreants. Throw in suitors who scheme and hire a beau for a chance with the younger sister and you have the plot. The film is beyond funny and smoothly satirizes high school life. The dialogue is crisp and genuine and takes advantage by quoting Shakespeare here and there. The real gem is the acting with the four main players not only bringing reality to their roles but a nice dose of chemistry (especially Stiles and Heath Ledger). Funnyman Larry Miller plays the father and steals a scene or three. And Andrew Keegan enjoys his time as the foil. Highly recommended; as is the Shakespeare play the film is loosely based on.

Hug it out!

So one Jeremy Piven, aka the Pivert, recently led Wrigley Field in a rendition of "Take Me Out to the Ball Game" in somewhat controversial fashion. Defamer has the lowdown here.

And here's some more background. The Cubs have had a less than stellar season so far. It's actually a big disappointed due in part to major injuries just before the start of the season. The Pivster is a native Chicagoan who's been a longtime Cubs fan.

I basically find this pretty hilarious and good natured. I mean it is crass to be so attached to a catch phrase that you can't go 5 seconds without saying it, but in my opinion he was trying to be jovial and knew how disappointed Cubs fan were with the season.

Anyway, the next time you're with friends and things seem gloomy, I think you know what to say.

MIA for a short while

Sorry folks, only one post this week (not including this one). Anyway, due to circumstances I'll be cutting back on blogging for the near future. I should be good for at least a post or two a week, but rarely more. Well, I just wanted to give you folks the heads up. Have a good one folks!

OCEAN'S ELEVEN (2001)

I strongly feel we live in a celebrity addicted society in which logic and rationality go out the window when it comes to celebs and the super rich. I preface this review with that statement because while I sorta enjoyed the remake of OCEAN'S ELEVEN, I have trouble understanding how popular it was. Only our addiction to celebrity could explain it. That or the audience was like 90% women and gays. I mean it was alright people!?! Sheesh, does everyone love the Clooney?!?! Anyway, on to the review.

Star Rating: *** out of 5

While I’ve given this film only 3 stars, I think most viewers would peg it as a 4 starer. If you’re looking for light entertainment, Vegas gaudiness (or elegance if you like that sort of stuff), and good looking guys in sharp outfits, then this is your movie. Basically a guy's guy fairytale, this heist flick is something you’ve seen before with a few thrills up its sleeve. I just don’t buy the whole neo-rat pack, cool super-thieves enterprise. And I’ve seen the original OCEAN’S ELEVEN (though that was a while ago) and I felt similarly — though in that case Sinatra, Davis, Martin, and all simply needed a project so they could party together. Just like in the original, all the actors seem as if they’re merely hanging around together. And for some that might be charming; for me it’s annoying and it’s not acting. Nevertheless, there are a couple of early scenes with Clooney and Roberts in which they’re flexing their acting muscles and it makes for decent viewing. For me, the first two-thirds of the movie are pretty slow and it’s only when we get to the heist itself that things get entertaining. I must admit, the heist sequence is fun and will keep you on edge and guessing. All in all a rather mediocre film with an entertaining ending. Hmm, I feel as though I’m forgetting something ... oh yeah, the plot: Clooney and Pitt round up a posse of professional, quirky criminals in a plan to rob three casinos.

Nachooooooooooooooooo!

Jack Black is my hero.

He recently spoke to Sports Illustrated about the training he did for NACHO LIBRE.

"I should take down someone who is strong, so Steven Seagal (would be perfect) - with his ridiculous Indian gear, ponytail and swagger. He's the best fighter in the world in his own mind, so I'll take him down two notches with my Anaconda Squeeze and Face Melter."

He went on to talk about a wrestling move of his own creation.

"The Wind of A Lion is basically a submission hold. You get the guy down, you sit on his face and then you release the lion's wind. That usually spells complete defeat."

Great Sports Article

Here's a great sports article on how a young, poor pitching prospect helped to change the financial side of the MLB draft. And while most of you frequenting my blog are probably not sports fan I thought I would link to this article because the writer does a tremendous job in telling us a personal story that is at once unique and, unfortunately, all to common in the sports world. It's just a good article that I think many of you will enjoy reading.

Politics Corner

I like to consider myself a cynical idealist. Yes, that's a bit of semantic trickery and even I'm not sure exactly what it means. But I tend to find myself hoping some politician out there will champion ideals and then telling myself "I told you so" when all I find are corrupt congressmen. Recently these corruption scandals have had a Republican tint. We all know about (though after the corruption has brought results) Tom Delay, Duke Cunningham, and Jack Abramoff. The Republicans are also in power, so an outside corruptor (like Abramoff) would, no doubt, focus on GOP members to get results.

Unfortunately, the Democrats aren't so clean either. As some of you may know, Democratic Congressman William Jefferson was found to be hiding a $90,000 bribe in his freezer. The bribe was to grease contracts from African nations. And as this WaPost article shows, this Jefferson is quite the character. He setup a web of companies under the names of his family members in order to launder his bribes around and partake in the lucrative deals he help setup.

But his unethical ways go farther back in time. A graduate of Harvard Law School he had to settle out of court for failing to pay the mortgages on his dilapidated rental properties. And he's more than a slum lord. One of his early business ventures was renting expensive appliances to the working poor.

As much as I want to believe in our politicians, there's too much evidence that some (perhaps many) are not working for the betterment of the people but for bribes and easy money. Just spend an hour or two browsing www.opensecrets.com and see where the money comes from and to who it goes to.

While reading the WaPost article I jokingly remarked to myself, "at least we're not as corrupt as Nigeria" were Jefferson bribed the Vice President with $500,000 for windfall, guaranteed contracts. But then I realized we have a Vice President who allowed the Energy industry to basically write energy policy.

ETERNAL SUNSHINE FOR THE SPOTLESS MIND (2004)

I've been wanting to catch ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND for some time now. And after experiencing it I'm mad I had not seen it sooner. If you've wanted to catch this stellar film but haven't ... do yourself a favor and write "eternal sunshine" on a post-it note and attach it to your forehead. Don't worry, the film is worth a day of weird looks.

On to the review:

Charlie Kaufman is as much a film auteur (author) as any major director working today. When you view one of his scripts on the screen you know you are in for something different, something artistic, something penetrating. For me, one of Kaufman’s main gifts is his ability to create such genuine, unsentimental couples. The relationships he describes jump off the screen; they’re multidimensional and real. At times you feel like a nosy neighbor, perhaps getting too much information. But that’s the gift and charm and insight, and this romantic comedy revolving around a quirky couple displays Kaufman’s wonderful writing ability front and center. Jim Carrey and Kate Winslet play the couple in question and at the heart of the plot is a medical-ish company that can erase all the memories of a bad relationship. Learning Winslet’s character has wiped him out of her memory, Carrey’s character does the same. During the process he has second thoughts and he takes us on a journey through his memories as he tries to hold on to precious moments. The camerawork is fantastic as Gondry uses just enough special effects (of which only a few are digital) to give us the feeling of a merging or collapsing memory. The acting is superb; everyone brings their A game. All in all, a masterwork by those involved.

As you can tell, I adore this film. I can't say enough about the acting or the dialogue. Kirsten Dunst and Mark Ruffalo, who have supporting roles, are phenomenal. And wait till you catch Elijah Wood in this flick. Kaufman and Gondry create a wonderful, hysterical and bittersweet milieu that this film completely embodies. A film definitely not to be missed.

Beware the Hat Gang!

I stole this from Idle but the people must know about ... they must!

IT'S CAT TOWN

Seriously, check out the sweeps episode.

Just read it, even if you're not impressed with the graphics.

2006 NBA Playoffs

The ratings have been up (as much as 10%) for this year's NBA playoffs and there's no doubt what the basic reason is. This year the playoffs have showcased amazing matchups which have produced hard-fought, entertaining games. LeBron had a great playoff run and I'm sure that brought in some viewers. As must have Kobe and the Lakers taking the Suns to 7 games in the first round. And speaking of the Suns, the always entertaining Steve Nash was once again league MVP (though I felt the voting should have been much closer with a three way race between Nash, Dirk Nowitski, and LeBron). And while great stars bring in viewers, I strongly feel it is the great games (setting records for overtime games and games won by 1 or 2 points) that have brought in the viewers.

During the regular season it seemed as if the Pistons were in a league of their own. And even though their second half of the season was not as magical as their first half, most felt the Pistons would make the finals. Over on the Western Conference, the always formidable Spurs wonderfully weathered a lingering injury to their stellar stud Tim Duncan. Many felt they were peaking at the right time and would also make it to the finals, setting up a rematch of last year's epic 7-game series between the Pistons and the Spurs.

I must admit that I felt likewise. For those who follow the NBA, you know that both teams are now out of the playoffs. The Spurs lost a tough series against the new look Mavs (helmed by the little general and NBA Coach of the Year Avery Johnson, now in his first full season as coach). The Pistons just lost to the new look Heat.

While the Spurs and Mavs faced off in the quarterfinals, they did have the top two records in the West. The tournament glitch might be taken care of by next year. Nevertheless, the 7-game series was majestic, with two games going into overtime (both times the Mavs outlasted the Spurs). Game 7 was a heavyweight fight. The Mavs jumped ahead with a flurry, building a 20 point lead. However the Spurs came charging back and the game headed into overtime. In the overtime period it was all Mavs, who seemed to have simply outlasted the Spurs. At the start of the series, I wasn't sure the Mavs could defeat the Spurs. But they proved me wrong by making shots when needed and getting a stop or two when needed (something they were not recently known for).

During last year's playoffs, one of the semifinal matchups was between the Pistons and the Heat. It came down to 7 games with the Pistons defeating a hobbled Heat team (Heat star Dwayne Wade missed game 6 and played game 7 on a bad ankle). If the Heat were healthy, it could have been them in last year's finals.

However, it will be the Heat in this year's final as they just defeated the Pistons in 6 games. I for one did not think the Heat would be this strong in the playoffs. Since last year the team has added quite a few new players and many (including me) felt they had yet to click together as a team or perhaps would never click. The great Pat Riley, returning as Heat coach, made the changes and he proved the critics wrong with his Heat having a great playoff run and finding themselves in the finals.

The remaining semifinal is between the Mavs and the Suns. And with the Mavs up 3 games to 2 this seems as though it will go the full 7 games as well. Though I thought the Mavs would rather easily win this series. Just goes to show that that's why they play the game (as well as proving I might not be ready to jump into the NBA coaching scene).

All in all, these playoffs have been absolutely memorable so far. And it seems the best part is yet to come. As for a prediction ... I'll give it a shot:

Mavs vs Heat in a 7 game final series. I have no clue which team will win, I could flip a coin and name a team, but you can do that as well.

I, ROBOT (2004)

I'm wary of summer blockbusters because H-wood has a penchant for making crappola. Filmmaking is a business to the studios so quite a few blockbusters are cold, rigid, by-the-numbers unoriginality. When I first heard about I, ROBOT I thought it would be more of the same. However, once I learned Alex Proyas (THE CROW, DARK CITY) was at the helm I had a slight change of tune. And after viewing the entertaining flick I can honestly say this is the rare summer blockbuster with substance and style.

A first rate sci-fi action thriller filled with enough suspense and intelligence to keep you on the edge of your seat. Will Smith is an old school cop who shuns the latest technology and finds robots (which are ubiquitous in 2035) cold and suspicious. He investigates what may be the first ever robot crime (a murder no less) with the help of Bridget Moynahan’s psychologist for robots. Director Alex Proyas illustrates the future with flourishes and dabs of sleek new fashions (the cars, the robots, the clothes). However, it’s not overboard which adds to the appeal and believability. The writers skillfully intertwine a superb murder mystery with the central theme of technology as a tool or another form of life. Proyas has crafted an all around great film that will entertain you and make you think. And as any great sci-fi flick should have, the film has a wonderful visual effect or two (once again Proyas and company keep it light, so as to not bog down the film with visual spectacle). Alan Tudyk is especially fantastic as one of the main robots (it’s his voice and facial expressions that bring the character to life). Highly recommended.

the curious incident of the dog in the night-time

I finally finished The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon. As many have mentioned, it is a wonderful read that one can devour over a short period.

Set in the British town of Swindon, the story introduces us to a stubborn, eccentric, accidentally charming teenager named Christopher Boone. Christopher, who suffers from Asperger's syndrome, views life through a different lens. With a stellar aptitude for mathematics, Christopher can tackle complex math and logic problems. However, due to Asperger's, he has trouble qualifying the emotions of others, as well as his own. A young man of solitude, crowds and small talk tend to frighten him. And yet Haddon takes us on a thrilling, suspenseful journey through an everyday environment many of us take for granted.

The book is a tour-de-force of original voice. Haddon not only makes Christopher incisively real, but figuratively paints such an empathetic picture that it is impossible not to be enraptured by the story (and the hero which centers it). And the story itself is not simply a mystery or peculiar thriller, but a complete slice of life revolving around a unique and courageous young man.

If you're looking for a great read with a unique voice and a tinge of deadpan wit, look no further than this book. I highly recommend it.

THE CONSTANT GARDNER (2005)

I just saw THE CONSTANT GARDENER and if you haven't seen this yet, run to blockbuster or head to netflix and get a hold of this film. It's that good.

Based on the John le Carre novel of the same name, the film follows a stolid, gregarious diplomat (Ralph Fiennes) and his impassioned, activist wife (Rachel Weisz) as they head to Kenya. Early on in the story the wife is murdered under suspicious circumstances (in more ways than one). I could dwell on the plot a bit more but this is the type of thriller that doesn't need any selling.

The acting is superb, especially Fiennes (who should've been nominated; at least a Golden Globe nom) and Weisz (who deservedly won a Best Supporting Actress Oscar). The supporting cast is stellar as well. The director, Fernando Meirelles, is the impresario that helmed CITY OF GOD. I haven't seen that film, but the praise he received for it is certainly worthy in my estimation. Meirelles and his cinematographer (Cesar Charlone) show us a lush and gorgeous African landscape. They jump into the heart of the lively, colorful slums and villages of Kenya. And at the same time, they do not shy away from the comfort afforded to the diplomatic corps. The script is effectively paced and will keep you at the edge of your seat. This is also an enchanting love story and the magnetism between Fiennes and Weisz jumps off the screen. I can't say enough good things about this film. Please go see it.

And for those of you who have seen the film (or read the book), this is what le Carre had to say about his tale: "...by comparison with the reality, my story was as tame as a holiday postcard."

Word of the Day

This may prove my stupidity but so be it. Have we always spelled "curiosity" like that and not "curiousity"? Seriously, I never got the memo.

That ends today's word of the day entry.

Draw a Pig! You know you want to!

Yllwdaisies found this pig drawing site that lets you draw a pig and then has a little personality quiz on how you drew the pig. I don't buy the personality quiz section but it's kinda fun drawing the pig. Plus email or leave a comment linking to your pig drawing and Yllw will add it to her Pig Gallery.

Anyway, here's my pig:

THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY (1945)

As a major film buff I've seen masterpieces from various decades and countries. I'm pretty content with my breadth of film experiences. On the other hand, I'm a literary novice who really needs to devour many of the classics. However, sometimes I'll view the film adaptation of the literary masterwork. Such is the case recently when I was able to catch THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY.

This 1945 film is adapted from Oscar Wilde's only novel of the same name. The story tells the tale of one Dorian Gray who has his portrait made and turns to a life of debauchery and sin. As the years pass and the corruption and decay increase the portrait turns vile and disfigured while Dorian remains his youthful self, never aging. The film is solid and I highly recommend it. But I have to say that reading the book (which I haven't) will be more satisfying. I'm sure much of the detail of the book was lost during the transition to the screen. Nevertheless, the film was quite enjoyable. I'm curious to hear the thoughts of those who have read the book. I know I haven't gone into much detail, but I wonder for those who have read the book, do you think a film could do it justice?

Da Vinci Mania

I think I might be the only person who has yet to read Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code. And I'm not going to catch the film any time soon either. But with the film opening this week, Da Vinci Mania is upon us.

I hear Dan Brown writes very crafty, intriguing novels (he even had one set in the NSA before all the wiretapping and phone record monitoring came about) and that the Da Vinci Code is filled with enough conspiracy, history, religion, cryptology and suspence to keep a mind interested, entertained, and of course, guessing.

Anyway, here's my problem with novels being turned into movies. Novels are like 300 pages and the author has the space to detail every minutia and introduce numerous characters and subplots and the like. A movie script is basically 120 pages of dialogue. A movie thriller has a couple main characters and the action (and the movie) basically revolves around them. So the gist of what I'm trying to say is that trying to fit an entire novel into a film script is like squeezing a bowling ball into a baseball glove. In my opinion, novels are great material for a mini-series or a television show. In this case a novel's length and detail can be adequetely addressed. And on the other hand, plays and novellas and short stories make for great film script material.

Well, that's my thinking on the subject matter. Now it's your turn to chime in. Please comment!

TV Rec

So I've caught the last several episodes of the military drama The Unit. As someone who mainly watches PBS and the Daily Show (I can't forget to mention Mr. Colbert), The Unit is a pretty decent, entertaining hour-long drama. And it has made me refrain from the PBS for an hour on Tuesdays.

Anyway, as far as plot goes this show is hard to top. Every episode is packed with special ops mumbo jumbo, shootouts, espionage, foreign countries, war criminals, and the like. The Unit also shows the family side of the soldiers, specifically following the lives of the wives on the base. While this doesn't work as smoothly, it is by no means a deal-breaker. So it's a decent show that's suspenseful and action-packed.

So guess who the creators are? One of the creators is Shawn Ryan who also gave us The Shield, another interesting drama, this one revolving around an ethically neutral police detective (played by the Commish). Yes, that's not very surprising. Well, the other creator is David Mamet. That's right, David effing Mamet. Yeah, the Mamet has gone Mamet-lite in his entertaining, thin recent films, but I guess I was expecting a little more from The Unit when I read Mamet was a creator. Mamet and Ryan are executive producers and I haven't seen an episode in which either was the writer (or director) ... so maybe I've missed the Mamet-docious episodes or something.

Anyway, so what am I trying to say exactly? The Unit is a good show and if it piques your interest I'd definitely say check it out. But I'm still waiting for the Mamet-docious episodes.

Why ABC Sucks

The super geniuses (genii? no, that can't be right) at ABC have unveiled their Fall Lineup. Now, I'm a little biased because I think H-wood is filled with crappola that make crappola. But let me point a couple things in ABC's Fall Lineup and you decide.

Am I the only person that saw Sons & Daughters? This show was like the funniest thing on network television. It had an amazing cast (much of the show was improvised) and the stories about family life were sincere without being overly sentimental. And did I mention it was HIGH-LAR-I-OUS? Anyway, the brain trust at ABC decided not to pick up the sitcom. The show actually had decent audience numbers and was only a mid-season offering. Had they renewed it, I'm sure it would have added viewers. ABC did pick up What About Brian? Now I haven't seen this show but it looks lame. And I bet Sons & Daughters would open up a can of whoop ass on it.

ABC also moved Grey's Anatomy to Thursdays at 9pm. That's up against CSI. NBC is going with a Matthew Perry drama/comedy/something in that time slot as well. Now GA is a pretty decent show with a steady audience on Sundays at 10pm. I guess ABC feels GA can take on CSI head to head. I'm not so sure. CSI is like Law & Order circa 2000 ... unstoppable (though I'm like the only person in the world who hasn't seen an episode of CSI, ever). But who knows, maybe GA will make inroads against CSI. I doubt it however. Most likely it will start decent (if not strong) but steadily decline. However, ABC will just return it back to its Sunday timeslot.

And speaking of GA. I'm sorry ladies but I think I've had enough of Meredith and Shepherd. I mean either get together or don't. Whatever. And the other plot lines are entertaining enough.

The Viswanathan Chronicles

So the other day I had a post about this Harvard Sophmore, Kaavya Viswanathan, with the big book deal and the teen chic-lit book and the plagiarism that ensued. In that post was a great slate column by Ann Hulbert which argued the publishing company and literary agency may have nudged Kaavya along the road to borrowsville.

Well, there's more news on the Kaavya situation. Apparently more similarities to other teen novels have arisen and the publisher has recinded the contract and taken the book off the shelf.

Yes, it may be hard to have sympathy for this well-to-do, over-achieving Harvard teen. But, as the slate piece points out, if she started her book journey with original intentions only to be gently shoved into reading teen chic-lit to come up with something similar ... well then, it seems the publisher and agency have a hand in this mess as well.

In the short term, this might be mildly embarrasing for Miss Viswanathan. But if she has half the talent all these new pieces on her say she has, then some time down the road she'll produce a wonderful novel. And she'll be able to do it on her own terms.

Unless she plagiarizes again. Hah. I just had to add that last part of dramatic and comedic effect.

Get Your Truthiness!

Here's a link to Stephen Colbert's great speech at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. For some strange reason YouTube took the vids down ... but that's why we have Google Video:

Enjoy!

Okay this is kinda weird but maybe some people out there will find it interesting. Apparently ABC News cameras stayed on President Bush for 7 minutes during Colbert's speech. And the folks over at YouTube have yet to take it down. So this tape has caught his real time facial expressions on the speech:

Bush Reaction Tape

Outdoor Corner

Two lost hikers stumbled upon the remnant camp of a hiker who vanished over a year ago. The two young hikers were only out for a day hike when they wandered off the trail. They felt the trail was still nearby but were apparently lost. Their day hike turned into a three day ordeal filled with hunger and cold sleepless nights. By chance they discovered the camp of a vanished hiker and found a few handy supplies. The most important had to be the matches from which they could start a fire to keep warm, and ultimately a signal fire which rescued them. The article is a startling read and shows just how tenuous any hiking trip may turn out. Another reason to invest in some GPS technology as well as outdoors preparedness. And another reason I'm not the outdoorsy type.

Film Rec

So I recently caught two solid films, a classic and a soon to be classic.

First up we have The School of Rock. Now the combination of director Richard Linklater and comedic virtuoso Jack Black means cinema gold in my book. But, I must admit, going into the film I was expecting a dressed up after-school special. And while the uplifting plot won't surprise anyone, the film works deftly in its own feel good, charming way. Anyway, if this sounds hokey and sentimental to you don't worry because the film is still absolutely hilarious and the music (all the child actors are also trained musicians) is quite good. Seriously, you should see the film just for the Jack Black, Joan Cusack scenes.

The classic I was referring to is In the Heat of the Night. This 1967 film stars Sidney Poitier and Rod Steiger with Norman Jewison at the helm. This film is definitely a favorite of mine and I like to point at it as proof H-wood made decent films at one time. And this is not to say H-wood simply makes crappola nowadays but how many Lindsay Lohan or Tom Cruise films must the world really need. The major studios no longer care about art, even in the sense of telling a good story. They're mainly interested in bankable stars and their target audience (15 year-olds from Orange County). Anyway, this classic film (based on the John Ball novel) follows the trials of a black, Philly homicide detective (Poitier) who thanks to the racist charms of Mississippi gets stuck helping the local police in a murder investigation. Steiger plays the local police chief who needs Poitier's help but finds himself in trouble navigating the town's racial overtones as this black detective tries to solve the murder. The film is well crafted in every aspect and while it may not be as gritty as a modern telling, the Poitier, Steiger interplay has a lot to say even in the new millennium. Highly recommended.

TV Rec

Did anyone else watch Texas Ranch House on PBS? It's basically PBS' version of a reality show. There have been other installments such as Frontier House and 1900 House. Anyway, Texas Ranch House was interesting enough. But the social interactions between the participants truly made viewing the program worthwhile. In the end, the ranch became a tacit war between the ranch hands/cowboys and the ranch owners/Cooke Family. I'd agree with the experts' assessment that the Ranch owner made several mistakes while the ranch hands successfully brought the cattle to market. At the same time the ranch hands were truly chauvinistic (at times). In the end, the program shows just how tenuous the ranch owner and ranch hand relationship must have been. Back then, over a century ago, ranch owners and cowboys solidified a working relationship. Perhaps this program has something to say about modern society in that the modern participants weren't able to get along. In my opinion, both sides of the ranch are somewhat to blame. Anyway, if anyone else caught this program please share your thoughts. Thanks.

Sports Scene

Who's ready for the World Cup? The US Team was just announced and we look mighty fine. We have a good deal of euro league players as well as a couple MLS stars. However, we're in a tough division. We'll have to deal with one of the top ranked teams in the world in the Czech Republic, perennial powerhouse Italy, and Ghana, one of the top teams in Africa.

I don't follow soccer-football very closely but I think our team will do quite well in this year's World Cup. The first game is on June 12th. Stay tuned for more Team USA updates.

PS - who's watching LeBron vs Gilbert right now?

PPS - who's ready for Suns vs Lakers tomorrow?

Good Govt.

As a cynical idealist I don't have much faith in most of our elected officials. But certain politicians are fighting the good fight and several (if not most) political flip-floppers will swing to the good side ever so often (or when the cameras are around).

Anyway, I want to tip my hat and give a hearty thanks to a handful of Congress men and women who protested in front of Sudan's Embassy. The members of Congress (as well as 6 others, all 11 were arrested) wanted to put a spotlight on the Darfur situation and specifically on a deadline (which has been extended) for an agreement between Sudan's Govt. and Darfur representatives.

Sudan's government has been terribly uncooperative with international efforts to curb the genocidal violence and at the same time continues to stealthily support the militias which are responsible for the violence.

I would also like to add that the Bush Administration has labeled the Darfur situation genocide and was instrumental in bringing the issue before the UN Security Council. Currently African Union troops are in the region and soon a UN peace keeping mission will arrive.

The Darfur situation is complex. For more information check out this great AP article.

Bringing the Truthiness!

Thanks to Lisa over at Lam(b) I was informed that the great Stephen Colbert addressed the White House Correspondent's Dinner. Thankfully I was able to find the speech on YouTube. I hear C-Span will be replaying it but I'd recommend just catching the greatness at your leisure over at YouTube. They have the video split up into 3 parts. Here are the links in sequence:

Colbert@WHDinner Part 1

Colbert@WHDinner Part 2

Colbert@WHDinner Part 3


And what everyone has been waiting for ... an NBA Playoffs rundown. Two games in the books today and two exceptional matches. First the Baby Bulls (I'm on the bandwagon) played one hell of a game to even up the series with the struggling Heat. Yes the Heat have the talent but, the way I see it, they're not playing well together and are definitely vulnerable (re: my earlier post). And the Suns vs the Lakeshow was a nail-bitter that went into overtime. The Lakers won on some big shots but Nash was totally fouled --- hello!?!?!?! Hah. I guess it can't be the playoffs in the refs aren't involved.

Dare Not to Laugh

Below is the funniest thing since Ashlee Simpson. After you check out the video head on over to their blog: The Dormitory Boys

Yes, I'm Jealous

So the publishing world is aflame after Harvard Sophmore Kaavya Viswanathan was discovered to have gratuitously borrowed from the writings of teen-lit author Megan McCafferty. Plagiarism is always bad, but what strikes me from all this hubbub is that she was reportedly given $500k for her book deal (which includes two books, one of which she has just completed). 500 grand?!?!? She's like 19. Who is she, Shakespeare over here!?!? Man, when I was 19 I was playing video games and watching the NBA Playoffs. Anyway, stealing other people's ideas and work is bad. But paying a 19 year-old $500k to write two books about how girls are mean and image isn't everything ... well that just ain't right. Either that or I'm just jealous.

Anyway, for more on this check out Slate's wonderful piece by Ann Hulbert on how Viswanathan's publishers and agents may have helped in nudging her to "borrow."

Speaking of the NBA Playoffs, how about dem Bulls? I love how they play and I think Miami is vulnerable. I see this series going 6 or 7. Sacto almost stole a game from the defending champs (the Spurs). But after such a heartbreak loss, I think the Kings are done. The Lakers and Suns is definitely the series to watch. I thought the Suns would win in 5 or 6 but now that the Lakeshow has home court advantage, the Suns are in some trouble. Both Cavs/Wizards and Nets/Pacers seem like they'll be heading for the long haul. Hopefully LeBron will pull his team to victory and the Pacers will outlast the Nets.

Monopoly

So the Hasbro people are going to update Monopoly in a "Here and Now" edition. That means the Railroads will become Airports and the streets will become famous landmarks from across the country. The cool thing is that they're letting people vote on the landmarks. So head on over to the website and vote!

Network Neutrality

I'm not sure how many of you out there are following the Network Neutrality debate but I thought I'd drop a post about it with some nice links so people can look into the issue on their own.

Basically, Network Neutrality means all data that transfers over the internet is treated equally. No particular data stream (such as from a company that pays a broadband company a premium) gets special, faster access. Broadband Internet companies (DSL and Cable) want to favor certain data and then charge a premium to companies that want access to this more efficient data stream.

Personally, I find this egregious. The internet is a simple network that treats all data the same. To turn it into a complex system with a premium priced fast track lane is anathema to what the world wide web embodies.

Before I go any further, I'd like to post two great links. For some general info, check out Wikipedia's Network Neutrality article (esp the advocates and opponents section). For my money, Bob Cringely knows technology. Check out his thoughts on the subject in this Feb column.

And for those of you that decide Network Neutrality is a good thing, please head on over to Moveon.org and sign a petition that tells Congress we don't want the DSL and Cable companies gutting Network Neutrality.

The Blog Down

I just wanted to post a round up, if you will, of the great blogs I peruse regularly and a couple I've recently added.

The Great Lisa Manzi over at Lam(b) has posted two of her piercing and enchanting poems. The poems will be published in Amoskeag: The Journal of Southern New Hampshire University. If you have the chance, head on over and check them out. You will truly enjoy them.

Next, I'd like to point you to a couple new blogs. The Grumpy Owl has it all. Science. Fiction. And Science Fiction. And some of the wittiest commentary this side of Episelon Sigma. Get it ... get it? That's me doing a sci-fi joke. Lame? Yes. Funny? No. But I sold it.

And if you enjoy handy tips in an off-kilter manner, then Norm's your guy over at The Post and Beam.

And finally, get your Wilson fix (this dog is a cuddle magnet) over at The Idle Receptionist. And get your Marse fix over at The Pink Shoe. And your Sage fix over at Musings.

NBA Playoffs - Day 1

It's Playoff time in the NBA and there are some very intriguing matchups. Day 1 (yesterday) was pretty interesting. For those of you that missed it, here's a rundown.

The Cavs beat the Wizards and King James recorded a triple-double in his first playoff game. This is a good matchup because in the regular season the Wizards took the series 3 to 1. But with Bron-Bron playing his A game, the Wizards are going to have a hard time getting the best of this playoff series.

The Spurs looked incredible in their dominating performance against the Kings. They won by close to 40 points.

The Clippers beat the Nuggets in last night's late game. I did not catch it but apparently the Clips had a 10 point lead near the end but coughed it up, only to eek out victory in the end. Even though the Nuggets are the higher seed, the Clippers have the better record and in my opinion are the stronger team. But if the first game was close, it may mean the entire series will be close.

The Heat beat the Bulls in a very competitive game. If you ask me, the Heat look a bit iffy and a hot team like the Bulls might be able to pull out the upset. I saw this game and it was great. The Bulls kept it close for the entire game and just fell a little short at the end. A good deal of that had to do with the Heat's Wade and O'Neal who played exceptionally. Gordon, Hinrich, and Nocioni of the Bulls put in stellar performances. I hope this series is close. And if the first game is any indication, it will be a marvelous series to watch.

Pet Corner

I don't have any pets but some time in the future I think I'll bond with a pup from the pound/shelter. Nevertheless, I like to think of myself as a big animal lover ... especially dogs. Watching PBS the other day I was able to come across a wonderful program called "Pets: A Very Natural History". The program mixed a short history of animal domestication with a couple insightful real life human/pet events. If this program airs on your local PBS station, I definitely recommend checking it out.

Two of the real life stories dealt with the uncanny bond between a human and a dog. In the first, a 6 foot, 180 pound man collapsed in a field near his house due to a heart attack. His 45 pound English Setter, Sadie, was able to drag his in-and-out of consciousness body for nearly two hours. She dragged him right up to his porch.

In the second story, a man's Golden Retriever, Dakota, was able to predict his heart attack seconds before it happened. The program mentioned that it is likely Dakota's sense of smell is so advanced that she was able to detect a change in her owner's sweat that precedes a heart attack. Dakota even predicted a co-worker's heart attack.

When I was younger I naturally wanted a pet but I wasn't willing to be responsible for it. And when I would hear other people talk about their pets as a member of the family I would (honestly now) find it a little strange. But I think that's perfectly normal now. When you care for a pet and it returns limitless affection and love ... and when such a friend actually saves your life ... not only is it natural to think of that pet as a member of the family but it seems strange not to.

Dimming the Sun

Tomorrow's NOVA will tackle Global Warming and make the argument the planet is heating up faster than estimated. As someone who doesn't know much about Global Warming, only of it's singular importance and that I should know more about it, watching PBS' preeminent science show discuss this issue is appointment television. If any of you out there in the blogverse are interested, this will undoubtedly be a great watch.

Does this mean I have to smoke hash?

So I found this pretty cool quiz on PondPerspective (via The Grumpy Owl) and I had to post it. First off, you know you want to do the quiz ... Do the quiz! Hah.

Seriously, I thought this quiz would turn out badly (cough*Paris*cough --- sorry ladies) but I was pleasantly surprised. I just hope this place survives the rise of the ocean thanks to global warming. PS - more on global warming in a second post.

You Belong in Amsterdam

A little old fashioned, a little modern - you're the best of both worlds. And so is Amsterdam. Whether you want to be a squatter graffiti artist or a great novelist, Amsterdam has all that you want in Europe (in one small city).

What European City Do You Belong In?

Mentos and Diet Coke: The Geyser Maker

So I was listening to NPR yesterday and this tidbit comes on. Apparently this is all the rage with the young whipper-snappers. For some reason (if you listen to the piece they explain it but I've already forgotten but it has something to do with carbon dioxide and other sciencey stuff) when one combines Mentos and a 2 liter bottle of Diet Coke a 12 foot geyser of coke is the result. Definitely check out the Google Video link, in fact I'll also link to it seperately.


NPR - Mentos and Diet Coke
Google Video by Joshua Wise

How Hairy Am I?

Below is a photo of my cheek. First off people, get your mind out of the gutter. Second off, guess how many days' beard growth that is on my cheek. I think most of you will be completely surprised. Plus I'm rather curious as to your guesses. Thanks for participating. The winner will get a comment from me on their blog. 2nd place through 50th place will get a comment from me on their blog.

Film Rec

The Sage man has a great review on Werner Herzog's GRIZZLY MAN on his blog. You should definitely check it out.

Recently I was able to catch ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN for the first time. As a cynical idealist who believes certain conspiracies exist this film was amazingly enjoyable for me (surprise, surprise). One part docudrama and one part journalistic X-File, this skillfully crafted film takes you inside the Watergate Scandal as Washington Post reporters Woodward and Bernstein uncover a high-ranking illegal conspiracy in the Nixon Administration. As someone who knew a slight bit about Watergate, the film is not only entertaining but also informative. Unfortunately the film ends lacklusterly with only a hint of the stature of the conspiracy and a tidy recap of convictions and Nixon's resignation. It would have been stellar for the film to end with the conclusion of Woodward and Bernstein's piercing investigation but I'm guessing the studio heads were asked to soft pedal things. I'd be happy with at least something on the Nixon tapes. Nevertheless the film is wonderfully set in a noir-ish DC and revered screenwriter William Goldman injects some funny, memorable lines into a decently adapted script (what about the ending though Goldman!?!?! Hah.) Anyway, if Redford and Hoffman as Woodward and Bernstein piques your curiousity you'll have a wonderful time with the film. Afterwards make sure to head on over to Wikipedia's Watergate Scandal article to pique your curiousity further.


PS - I saw "Grey's Anatomy" again and I'm officially on the bandwagon. GA lives up to the hype and there's a lovely sweetness to it that you don't see very often on tv ... at least in a genuine sense. Usually there's a cloying fakeness to it. Not so with GA --- you go Shonda, you go. Hah, I can't believe I typed the "you go" bit ... I am sooooo gay.

PPS - Is "Sons & Daughters" not the funniest thing on tv right now?!?!?! (Hmmm, yesterday's "The Simpsons" was pretty damn funny) Like GA, there's an underlying sweetness ... greatly exemplified in last week's episode in which Cameron and Sharon's biological father returned. But it also has another thing going for it ... that it is bat-guano insanely hilarious.

PPPS - Watch tomorrow's FRONTLINE! It's on China and the extraordinary Tankman --- the protestor who stood infront of the procession of tanks. That man (whoever he is) is a personal hero of mine.

Welcome to the Future

I don't believe in race. Let me elaborate. Race is a man-made system of categorization. We cannot scientifically measure race to any significant degree and as $200 DNA tests of your cheek cells will show most of us are multi-racial. In a few years we're all going to be Tiger Woods. Well, except we'll suck at golf.


Over in merry ol' England a special pair of fraternal twin sisters are about to turn one. Born to multi or bi-racial parents, one of the sisters basically looks black and the other basically looks white. While it is a genetic rarity it is entirely possible and seems to have occurred with these two cute little girls.



I bet you Mother Nature and Gawd (if they are seperate people/entities/beings/whatever) are smiling brightly at the sight of this. For people on this planet to think that human beings are different because of the color of their skin is sad, and false, and wrongheaded. If they need more proof to the error of their thinking, I ask them to simply gaze upon the blonde and raven haired twin sisters and dare to think they are different races.

Don't Hate

I'm a bit of a news junkie and part of that is an embarrassing addiction to celebrity news and gossip. Recently, I've been much better in curbing this habit ... but a recent tidbit has popped up that I must comment on.

Thanks to Dlisted and The Green Straw I was able to find out that David Spade and Heather Locklear are dating.

I like this pairing and I'm here to back up the Spade-man. All the commentary seems to be how the not-so-tall, not-so-manly Spade pulled the stun-a-licious Locklear. First of all Spade is hilarious. All you ladies talk about is "I want someone to make me laugh" or "I can never find a guy with a great sense of humor" yadda yadda. Second, Spade has good hair and boyish good looks. Don't you women go crazy for those boyish looks? And finally, Spade is 3 years younger than Locklear. She's practically robbing the cradle ... hah ... okay she's not. Anyway, score one for the Spade-man ... I like this couple ... they'll last 3 weeks.

Mess With Texas

Corrupt politician (and most probably Satan's minion) Tom DeLay backed out of his re-election campaign. DeLay basically stated that any other Republican would have an easy time in his heavily right-leaning district. DeLay did win the Republican primary.

I'm a registered Green Party member and my politics are all over the ideological map. However, how in the hell did DeLay win the primary?!?!?! I mean how blind to the corruption scandal does one have to be to vote for this guy.

I hate to jump to conclusions but I think this proves that people in Texas are insane.

Film Rec

The other day in school I was able to watch an insightful, touching film titled MARIA FULL OF GRACE. The story follows a 17 year-old Columbian girl on her decision to become a drug mule and her journey into the US. The writer/director, Joshua Marston, paints a portrait of a young girl that is at once alien to us as well as thoroughly familiar. And the teenager is superbly portrayed by actress Catalina Sandino Moreno who was nominated for an Oscar last year. Moreno brings a toughness to the role that is as gritty and believeable as the film itself. If you can catch this great film on DVD, I highly recommend it.


PS - I saw another episode of "Grey's Anatomy" yesterday. While I enjoyed it I'm still not completely sold. I'll keep everyone updated since I'm sure my opinion of Grey's Anatomy is on everyone's mind, hah.

Mmmmmm, The Simpsons Movie, mmmmmmmm

There's a teaser trailer out for the film version of The Simpsons. It will be out next July. I love The Simpsons and the movie version will be outstanding. I'm not sure if there is any plot or story information out there yet, but as soon as I find something I'll be sure to post. If anyone hears anything please leave a comment, thanks.

Jack (abram)Off Gets Nearly 6 years

Corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff got nearly 6 years in the slammer. Hopefully he does time in a real prison and not a club Fed type deal. He has to pay about 20 million in restitution for the crime he was convicted of. This is a start and I strongly hope it isn't the end. Hopefully we'll see Jack Off's buddy Tom Delay in the slammer soon as well.

Jill Carroll Released

CSM Reporter Jill Carroll was released after being a hostage for 3 months. Terrorists, criminals, insurgents, etc who take hostages are repulsive, dehumanized, evil scum. They will get what they deserve one way or another. However, it is great news to see that Carroll was released and unhurt.

TV Rec

When I was in high school I fell in love with a charming, good looking, touching, and at times insightful ensemble medical drama entitled "ER". It's been years since I've seen an episode of the show but I fondly recall watching it religiously as a teenager. Back then the tinge of soap opera mixed in with intense medical action was the perfect combination to turn me into an addict (though as a tv-holic that wasn't that hard to do). And even though today it takes a great deal of genuine emotion and sharp insight to make me bother with anything dramatic on the screen, I do remember certain episodes which I would rate high in both categories, even today.

Anyway, you're probably wondering why all the wax nostalgia for "ER". Well, I'll tell you why. Yesterday while making my 10pm bedtime I began flipping channels. With nothing much on I decided to check out what all the fuss is about and stopped the clicker on "Grey's Anatomy". While I'm not a Grey-Head, I will definitely check out future episodes. I must say the show is very enjoyable and reminds me a good deal of the first few seasons of "ER". I'm not sure the Dempsey is the next Clooney but the Pompeo sure is a hottie, maybe she's the next Clooney. I still enjoy the drama and action focusing on medicine over the portion of the show that deals with the (at times cliched) feminine navel-gazing and the "he likes me/he likes me not" in-depth discourse. I understand this criticism is a bit male biased and I'm no doubt jumping to conclusions after watching only a single episode. However I'll be sure to keep this in mind when viewing future episodes and I'll no doubt eat crow if my criticisms are off the mark. And please don't get me wrong, all in all "Grey's Anatomy" is a pleasing, engrossing drama and I look forward to the next episode.

I don't watch many dramas. Before I stumbled upon "Grey's Anatomy" my tv drama rotation consisted of Law and Order: CI and the original Law and Order from time to time. One drama I want to check out is "The Unit" ... unfortunately I haven't been able to check it out because one of the funniest things I've seen in a long time is airing in the same time slot. I'm talking about "Sons and Daughters" a simply hilarious semi-improvised situation comedy that's funny and sharp and warm and biting and even more. Seriously folks, if you haven't checked out this show I implore you to give it a shot. I am so enamored with this show that it isn't even funny ... well it is but only because the show is HIGH-larious. Anyway, if you've never heard of this show you are truly missing out. Watch it people!

March Madness

As a hoop head I love all things basketball. Unfortunately this year, with school and my lazy-itis, I haven't kept up with the NCAA Basketball. However things all change when the Tourney rolls around as the matchups are intriguing for even the most casual of viewers.

I'm pretty sure everyone's brackets have already been busted. I'm glad to see UCLA make the final four. I'm a big fan of UCLA's coach Ben Howland who has been very successful during his young coaching career. And that Farmar kid is pretty good. It's funny, but I like to call the college athletes "kids" whenever I can refer to them. I'm about 7 to 8 years older than most of them ... and while this makes me feel old, at least I can call them "kids" --- heh.

And what a story the kids (there I go) from George Mason have created. A number 11 seed that many thought should not have made the tourney in the first place. Not only have they silenced the critics but they've changed the landscape, giving their conference mucho bragging rights.

The Final Four is rounded out with Florida and LSU. Florida under Billy Donovan has been perennial underachiever (at times) in the tourney. This time one could argue they're overachieving and that's a testament to the program Donovan has created.

I'm going with a UCLA vs George Mason matchup with UCLA winning it all. This isn't a knowledgeable prediction so don't head to Vegas with it.

Blog Book Club Update

Well folks, it has been awhile since the last book club post ... and there's a reason behind that. I still haven't finished The Curious Incident, in fact I haven't read a page since the last book club post. School has taken up most of my time so

Blog buddy Sage has another book review post up, this time on the wonderrriffic travel writer Paul Theroux. Click here to read more.

My apologies in letting this bloggy book club thingy dwindle, but I'll let yall in on a little secret ... I'm kinda lazy.

If anyone else has a book club/review post please leave a comment and I'll link to it.

Time to Un-Pimp Your Auto

I dislike commercials for many reasons. First, they sell crap I don't need. Second, they do so in a (usually) annoying way. Third, they're too numerous --- PBS does fine with barely any commercials (or none if you want to call them sponsor notifications).

However, once in a blue moon a commerical will appear that's actually entertaining. A commercial like the recent VW "Time to Un-Pimp Your Auto" spots. If you haven't seen these ads you are missing out on insane hilarity. To view the commercials online check out this link:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=0I0WfnhVs2s


Nonetheless, as much as I want to give VW credit I also want to give them a swift kick in the nads for their super-crappy "make friends with your fast" commercials.

We were close people!?!?!?!

Some of you may remember the post about Slate's Oscar contest a week or so ago. Anyway, Slate finally posted the answers. We were 3 names off. Here's a link to the updated Slate Oscar Contest page:
http://www.slate.com/id/2138338/

Here are the answers with our 3 incorrect guesses in parentheses:

1. George Clooney
2. Christopher Walken
3. Catherine Zeta-Jones
4. Jack Lemmon
5. Joaquin Phoenix
6. Morgan Freeman
7. Vivien Leigh (Joan Crawford -- the color photo should have eliminated Crawford)
8. Ang Lee
9. Katharine Hepburn
10. Woody Allen
11. Meryl Streep
12. Russell Crowe
13. Renée Zellweger
14. Cary Grant
15. Reese Witherspoon
16. Bette Davis (Liz Taylor -- I still think this is Liz, lol)
17. Frank Sinatra (Henry Fonda -- I think someone mentioned Sinatra)
18. Hilary Swank
19. Diane Keaton
20. Marlon Brando

Anyway, 17 out of 20 ain't too shabby. Way to go blog buds!

So I've been meaning ...

to post this question to the blog buds out there ... people, I need your help!

What do people think is a generation --- 20 years, 25, 30? Ya know, like when someone says, "In a generation the technology will become ubiquitous ... yadda yadda" --- what's the time period that consists of a generation?

If I had to guess I would say 25 ... but that's just me.

Read Slate

I think Slate is the greatest thing since sliced bread. In Human Guinea Pig, one of the outstanding columns at Slate, author Emily Yoffe tries her hand at unique and interesting occupations. In the current edition of the column she tries lobbying. As usual it is a very enjoyable read, all the more so since her lobbying group deals with pets. Anyway, if I've piqued your interest here's the link:

http://www.slate.com/id/2137886/nav/tap1/

Film Rec

Over the last few weeks I caught A Beautiful Mind and What Lies Beneath on the good ol' network tele. I might as well drop a lil' something-something on each.

Yes, I am one of the eleven people out there that had not seen A Beautiful Mind. As someone who tries extremely hard to retain judgement until he has seen a film, I must say I thought the Ron Howard helmed, Russell Crowe starring film was going to be overrated no matter what. I was a little surprised to find it an outstanding film that lives up to the hype. The acting is superb and the story unfolds in a magical, lyrical blend of happiness, fantasy, paranoia, and grim adversity. It is without a doubt a very poignant and insightful look at mental illness and the personal story of John Nash. However, I must add, there's some poetic license taken with Nash's biography. In real life Nash had a child out of wedlock and his wife (played by the raven haired beauty Jennifer Connelly) divorced him soon after the birth of their child. She then took him in as a basically a border and they lived as distant roommates for years. In 2001 they remarried.

Another lesson in not pre-judging a film is What Lies Beneath. Director Robert Zemeckis needed to keep busy with a film crew while Tom Hanks was getting ripped for CAST AWAY. What we have here is an old-fashioned thriller. While it's not Hitchcock it is Hitchcock-lite. Even the score reminds me of the Hitch classics. I found the movie to be quite enjoyable with a sexy Michelle Pfeiffer and a buff Harrison Ford (seriously check out his shirtless scenes, the guy made me tingle a little --- don't tell anyone! --- I'm not gay!). If you want a smart, sexy popcorn movie ... you'd do well with What Lies Beneath.

Nor Cal Weather

Here in Nor Cal we like to complain about the weather because it will jump from 60 to 80 in a day and from rain to sunshine. Now, all you non-Nor Cal people out there would call us spoiled weather brats ... and you're probably right. That said, the last few days have been cold and rainy. I'm not up on the weather so I have no idea if this has been a relatively cold winter or what ... but if I had to guess I would guess so.

So what am I getting at? A hail storm. Which I captured on the handy-dandy digital camera. I'm no Ansel Adams but at the least this is evidence Nor Cal gets some heavy duty weather every once in a blue moon or so.



I'm hoping to post a photo or three on a weekly basis. Hopefully my outdoor photography skills will improve ... otherwise I'll just have to post more nudie pics. Hah.

Phone Home!

They may have found liquid water on one of Saturn's moon. The moon in question is Enceladus and it seems the spacecraft Cassini has pics of a plume of ice and vapor emanating from underneath the moon's surface. The sciencey people think that means liquid water is underneath the surface and pressure is causing this plume.

This means there might be some form of life on the moon.

I think it means aliens. But not the scary type in movies that kill humans. I bet it's a dolphin-like race that likes to bake cookies.

Anyway, for those that are interested check out these news reports:
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=1706420
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060309_cassini_water.html

An Oscar Post

I'm a bit of a film snob so I haven't watched the Oscars in like years, but with the super-high-larious Jon Stewart hosting ... I had to catch this year's. Anyway, Jon Stew was on point and as long as he's hosting ... I'll probably watch. The attack ads with Stephen Colbert's great voiceover work were insanely funny.

As for the films, I haven't seen any of them (I've seen BATMAN BEGINS which was nominated for one award I think). I, like most I believe, thought Brokeback would be a shoe-in (especially after Ang Lee won for best director). I like to joke around that H-wood will soon be run by women and gays (which in a way it should since they're far more interested in a good film than the population as a whole). But I guess I forgot to calculate how many Angelinos reside in H-wood. Yeah, this is a bit cynical from me and I should probably view both films before talking trash ... but I need an Oscar post so this will do.

Glad to see Phillip Seymour Hoffman win as well as the lovely Rachel Weisz (I really need to see that Le Carre film).

Was it just me or did Jessica Alba look kinda scary thin? Like so thin her boobs shrunk a little?

Slate Oscar Contest - update #3

So Slate has an Oscar Contest and I think if we work together we can at least figure it out. It's basically identifying pics of Oscar winners and nominees. This is what I have so far:

(I have a good deal of guesses so if you want to take a look at the contest for yourself, click on the link before scrolling down)








1. George Clooney
2. Chris Walken
3. Catherine Zeta Jones ?? (Vi and BP agree)
4. Jack Lemmon
5. Joaquin Phoenix
6. Morgan Freeman
7. Joan Crawford ??
8. Ang Lee
9. Katherine Hepburn ??
10. Woody Allen
11. Meryl Streep
12. Russell Crowe
13. Renee Zellweger
14. Cary Grant ??
15. Reese Witherspoon
16. Liz Taylor ??
17. Henry Fonda ??
18. Hillary Swank (Idle to the rescue)
19. Diane Keaton
20. Marlon Brando