I'm not that familiar with John Fogerty but I recently came across a stellar song of his. It's from 2004 and was part of the Vote for Change tour that supported John Kerry in that year's presidential election. The song is titled Deja Vu (All Over Again). It is a political song about the Iraq War and resonanted with many in 2004. Perhaps it resonants with more today. But, regardless, it is simply a good song. The YouTube clip of the song has terrible audio, you'll probably have to increase the volume a good deal.
The next two are pretty popular so I'll briefly mention them. KT Tunstall and Corinne Bailey Rae. They're both from the United Kingdom as well. Tunstall is Scottish and Rae is British. Each one has a pretty popular tune right now, Suddenly I See for Tunstall and Put Your Records for Rae. Hmm, I just realized both songs are pretty girly. Man, I need to butch up.
And I'll do just that by mentioning a singer who's voice I have never heard. Robin Thicke. I think I saw an ad for his album or something. Anyway, upon seeing the last name I immediately thought of Alan Thicke. Yeap, the dad on "Growing Pains". It turns out Robin Thicke is Alan's son. Alan Thicke used to date Kristy Swanson when she was like 18 and he was 40. He also seemed like a douche for other reasons. Anyway, I checked out Robin Thicke's wikipedia entry and the guy doesn't seem so douchey. Seems like he's really into his music. And he's written a bunch of pop and R&B hits. Well more power to ya Robin! And your wife is hot. And, more importantly, near your age.
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
I like Macs ...
Not those Macs. Though I keep hearing and reading those are better than these.
And not Big Macs. As Morgan can tell you, they are quite unhealthy.
I'm a big fan of T-Mac. With the rock he is poetry on the hardwood.
And I absolutely, absolutely adore S-Mac. This song, World on Fire, is from Sarah Maclachlan's 2003 album Afterglow. According to Wikipedia, in 2004 she released a wonderful music video of the song. It's the rare music video that moves you and makes you think while being simply mesmerizing. Plus S-Mac is looking super hot.
I've been a big S-Mac fan since Building a Mystery. Which is kinda late in the S-Mac game so some of you were probably on the S-Mac wagon before me. Nevertheless I simply adore her and her music. She's even married to an East-Indian guy (a Canadian, as is she). Now I just have to figure out a way to replace this guy. I mean we all look a like. If anything Sarah would think of it as an improvement. I mean I just know S-Mac is the kind of girl who cannot resist a hairy belly.
(Raise your hand if you are tired of hearing about my hairy belly.)
And not Big Macs. As Morgan can tell you, they are quite unhealthy.
I'm a big fan of T-Mac. With the rock he is poetry on the hardwood.
And I absolutely, absolutely adore S-Mac. This song, World on Fire, is from Sarah Maclachlan's 2003 album Afterglow. According to Wikipedia, in 2004 she released a wonderful music video of the song. It's the rare music video that moves you and makes you think while being simply mesmerizing. Plus S-Mac is looking super hot.
I've been a big S-Mac fan since Building a Mystery. Which is kinda late in the S-Mac game so some of you were probably on the S-Mac wagon before me. Nevertheless I simply adore her and her music. She's even married to an East-Indian guy (a Canadian, as is she). Now I just have to figure out a way to replace this guy. I mean we all look a like. If anything Sarah would think of it as an improvement. I mean I just know S-Mac is the kind of girl who cannot resist a hairy belly.
(Raise your hand if you are tired of hearing about my hairy belly.)
Sunday, October 08, 2006
v Knows Baseball!
Do I know baseball or what?
I picked the Yankees and the Tigers swept them in 4 games (Game 1 was just the exception that proved the rule: pitching, picthing, pitching).
I picked the Twins and the A's swept them.
I picked the Dodgers and the Mets swept them.
I picked the Cards and that was only because they won Game 1 before I posted my predictions. Otherwise I would have probably gone with the Padres, who are currently down 2 games to 1.
Anyway, this proves it. I know my baseball.
And I must discuss the news that George Steinbrenner will fire Joe Torre and bring in Lou Pinella. This isn't Joe Torre's fault Steiny, its your fault for thinking you can just spend your way to the World Series. When the Yankees won they had great pitching. Yeah, every baseball team needs great hitters, but as we've seen time and time again ... postseason success is predicated on great pitching. There's another trend the Yankees should be aware of. The more Steinbrenner gets involved, the farther the World Series seems to get.
I picked the Yankees and the Tigers swept them in 4 games (Game 1 was just the exception that proved the rule: pitching, picthing, pitching).
I picked the Twins and the A's swept them.
I picked the Dodgers and the Mets swept them.
I picked the Cards and that was only because they won Game 1 before I posted my predictions. Otherwise I would have probably gone with the Padres, who are currently down 2 games to 1.
Anyway, this proves it. I know my baseball.
And I must discuss the news that George Steinbrenner will fire Joe Torre and bring in Lou Pinella. This isn't Joe Torre's fault Steiny, its your fault for thinking you can just spend your way to the World Series. When the Yankees won they had great pitching. Yeah, every baseball team needs great hitters, but as we've seen time and time again ... postseason success is predicated on great pitching. There's another trend the Yankees should be aware of. The more Steinbrenner gets involved, the farther the World Series seems to get.
Portrait of a Hairy Belly (part 2)
Before I complete humiliating myself, I'd just like to say thanks for the kind words. And as everyone can see, I was not lying, I do have a hairy belly. And it is magnificent. Actually, laser hair removal is in my future but first I need to return to a decent shape. Speaking of which here's another photograph from 5 weeks ago:
Once again the hairy belly is on display. Anyway, since then I've been exercising regularly. The regimen is not as intense as a year ago, but it seems to be working. I've lost 5 pounds by doing cardio 4 times a week, weights/resistance 2 times a week, and limiting my fat and caloric intake. (I cannot stress how important the 3 elements are together in order to burn fat and keep it off.) Here's a photograph from a few days ago:
Clearly I'm not close to my goal but I can see a visual difference in my body, the stomach is a bit flatter and there's a semblance of shape. It's only been 5 weeks and while I was hoping for some better results, I am content with the progress.
One of the reasons for posting these photos is of course motivational. Now I have extra motivation to keep up (perhaps even instensify) my workouts so that I can show I'm making progress and that I once was actually in decent shape. As others have mentioned, motivation can be hard to gain and maintain. But it is of the utmost importance because it will get one through the tough early stages where results seem too far away or impossible. Motivation will also get one back on track after the inevitable missteps and obstacles. Anyway, what I'm basically getting at (something I've thrown out there earlier on this blog, I think) is that if anyone out there is also starting or is in the middle of a fat burning regimen, I suggest with start up an informal "getting in shape" club. Now, of course, this doesn't mean posting pictures of yourself every month. (Though I would suggest taking photographs of your body for your own viewing because sometimes your body will change shape but the scale will only show a minimal loss. This is because fat isn't burnt uniformly throughout your body, certain problem areas are quite stubborn in burning fat. And you will probably gain some muscle which will offset the weight loss from the burnt fat.) But it would be nice to post about the progress one is making (or not making) once a month or so. Other members of this informal club could then comment encouragement and motivation, as well as share information on what methods seem to work best for them. There's a lot of information out there on how best to burn fat, it can get confusing. However, everyone is going to be a little different and need slightly tweaked regimens due to their personal characteristics.
Before February of this year, I made a few attempts to get into shape. Unfortunately, I'm a stubborn bonehead and I made a plethora of mistakes. But eventually I got the right information, mainly from a pretty smart, informative fitness expert named Tom Venuto. He runs a few informative websites, I believe they are all connected to his e-book titled "Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle" or something like that. I didn't pay for the e-book because I was able to glean enough information from his websites and google searches. The information worked for me, until I stopped exercising, of course. However, if anyone out there would like me to post about what type of exercise and diet regimen I am using to get back into shape, please let me know and I'll do so. I was planning to post about it anyway, but I was waiting to return to photograph 1 shape before doing so. To basically prove that the regimen/information works. To summarize, the basic keys are that one needs to do cardio, weights/resistance, AND to watch what they eat (limit calories and fat, while improving protein intake). But it is a bit more complicated than just that. Everyone has a different body shape and type. And it is best to either burn fat or gain muscle but not optimal to try to do both at the same time.
Wow. This post is way too long. But I'm going to post it anyway. My sincerest apologies if you read the entire thing. However thank you and I'll be your best friend. Or do one load of laundry for you. But it has to be colors. Have a good one.
Once again the hairy belly is on display. Anyway, since then I've been exercising regularly. The regimen is not as intense as a year ago, but it seems to be working. I've lost 5 pounds by doing cardio 4 times a week, weights/resistance 2 times a week, and limiting my fat and caloric intake. (I cannot stress how important the 3 elements are together in order to burn fat and keep it off.) Here's a photograph from a few days ago:
Clearly I'm not close to my goal but I can see a visual difference in my body, the stomach is a bit flatter and there's a semblance of shape. It's only been 5 weeks and while I was hoping for some better results, I am content with the progress.
One of the reasons for posting these photos is of course motivational. Now I have extra motivation to keep up (perhaps even instensify) my workouts so that I can show I'm making progress and that I once was actually in decent shape. As others have mentioned, motivation can be hard to gain and maintain. But it is of the utmost importance because it will get one through the tough early stages where results seem too far away or impossible. Motivation will also get one back on track after the inevitable missteps and obstacles. Anyway, what I'm basically getting at (something I've thrown out there earlier on this blog, I think) is that if anyone out there is also starting or is in the middle of a fat burning regimen, I suggest with start up an informal "getting in shape" club. Now, of course, this doesn't mean posting pictures of yourself every month. (Though I would suggest taking photographs of your body for your own viewing because sometimes your body will change shape but the scale will only show a minimal loss. This is because fat isn't burnt uniformly throughout your body, certain problem areas are quite stubborn in burning fat. And you will probably gain some muscle which will offset the weight loss from the burnt fat.) But it would be nice to post about the progress one is making (or not making) once a month or so. Other members of this informal club could then comment encouragement and motivation, as well as share information on what methods seem to work best for them. There's a lot of information out there on how best to burn fat, it can get confusing. However, everyone is going to be a little different and need slightly tweaked regimens due to their personal characteristics.
Before February of this year, I made a few attempts to get into shape. Unfortunately, I'm a stubborn bonehead and I made a plethora of mistakes. But eventually I got the right information, mainly from a pretty smart, informative fitness expert named Tom Venuto. He runs a few informative websites, I believe they are all connected to his e-book titled "Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle" or something like that. I didn't pay for the e-book because I was able to glean enough information from his websites and google searches. The information worked for me, until I stopped exercising, of course. However, if anyone out there would like me to post about what type of exercise and diet regimen I am using to get back into shape, please let me know and I'll do so. I was planning to post about it anyway, but I was waiting to return to photograph 1 shape before doing so. To basically prove that the regimen/information works. To summarize, the basic keys are that one needs to do cardio, weights/resistance, AND to watch what they eat (limit calories and fat, while improving protein intake). But it is a bit more complicated than just that. Everyone has a different body shape and type. And it is best to either burn fat or gain muscle but not optimal to try to do both at the same time.
Wow. This post is way too long. But I'm going to post it anyway. My sincerest apologies if you read the entire thing. However thank you and I'll be your best friend. Or do one load of laundry for you. But it has to be colors. Have a good one.
Friday, October 06, 2006
Portrait of a Hairy Belly (part I)
I'm not exactly sure why I'm doing this. Clearly I want attention. But I still think that if I document my failure to remain in shape along with my arduous and disciplined (I want it to sound harsher than it really is) journey to get back in shape, that it will help someone else gauge what kind of results are possible and what will result if they stop working out. And, at the least, the world will be able to view my glorious hairy belly.
This post starts in February of this year. After about 3 months of working out consistently and watching what I ate, my body looked like this:
I understand it's nothing special but I was particularly pleased with the flat belly. As you may be able to tell, I was so pleased I used some hair remover, lol.
Anyway, sometime in March or April I slowly regressed in my exercising habits and completely stopped working out soon after. There are several reasons for this. School was taking a little more time than usual and there are other factors I really don't want to talk about. After 4+ months of no exercise whatsoever and not really caring about what type of food I would put in my belly, I lost some muscle and gained some fat. This is my body on August 31, about 5 weeks ago:
There it is folks. The legendary hairy belly. As you can see the hair removal was temporary, lol. I must admit, the hairy belly does have a certain charm. If you look deeply, it has a mesmerizing effect.
Anyway, on August 31 I decided I'd have to raise the rent on my abdomen and kick this freeloading hairy belly goodbye. In part 2 I will document the change that has occurred over the last 5 weeks. I'm not exercising as intensely as I did leading up to the first photograph, but I am working out and it is on a regular basis.
This post starts in February of this year. After about 3 months of working out consistently and watching what I ate, my body looked like this:
I understand it's nothing special but I was particularly pleased with the flat belly. As you may be able to tell, I was so pleased I used some hair remover, lol.
Anyway, sometime in March or April I slowly regressed in my exercising habits and completely stopped working out soon after. There are several reasons for this. School was taking a little more time than usual and there are other factors I really don't want to talk about. After 4+ months of no exercise whatsoever and not really caring about what type of food I would put in my belly, I lost some muscle and gained some fat. This is my body on August 31, about 5 weeks ago:
There it is folks. The legendary hairy belly. As you can see the hair removal was temporary, lol. I must admit, the hairy belly does have a certain charm. If you look deeply, it has a mesmerizing effect.
Anyway, on August 31 I decided I'd have to raise the rent on my abdomen and kick this freeloading hairy belly goodbye. In part 2 I will document the change that has occurred over the last 5 weeks. I'm not exercising as intensely as I did leading up to the first photograph, but I am working out and it is on a regular basis.
Thursday, October 05, 2006
THE WIRE; indelible
HBO's "The Wire" is simply one of (if not) the greatest things to ever grace a television screen. I have been catching season 3 on DVD and it is as captivating as ever. The treatment of the gritty inner-city drug trade, the mainly ineffectual police work, and the CYA atmosphere of city politics combine to bring the viewer a thoroughly in-depth and insightful look into the major US city we call Baltimore. For anyone who is even remotely curious about this unbelieveable show, I highly, highly, highly recommend it. However, for those of you who won't be able to catch the show, I thought I would quote a memorable conversation from season 3.
I have thoroughly and utterly ripped off this idea of a Quotes Post from the Sage-man. Sage writes a wonderful blog filled with evocative stories from his past and present. Sage is also a voracious reader like many of the blog buddies I frequent. A few weeks back he came up with the ingenius idea of a post filled with quotes from the books he was reading. I am now going to "borrow" this idea, lol. In fact, I will have a post sometime next week with quotes from the school books that I am reading. Unfortunately, I'm not reading anything non-school related at this time. I am however watching a good amount of TV though. Some of it actually good, lol. "THE WIRE" is clearly something I adore and I thought the best way to share its power would be by paraphrasing a this conversation.
This conversation needs some context so I'll quickly describe the situation. It revolves around the character Dennis "Cutty" Wise. Dennis just completed a 15 year stint in prison for the manslaughter of a rival drug dealer. Something that was simply part of his job as muscle for one of Baltimore's major drug crews. Released from prison he seems to be a changed man, but has trouble finding work. Living in his grandmother's basement, he's trying to stay away from the drug trade. With few options, he tries to track down his old girlfriend. He does so, only to find her living a different, quiet life as a speech teacher in the suburbs. He's removed the mothballs from his suit and catches his old girlfriend, Grace, as she reaches her car on the school parking lot. Wearing the suit, Grace assumes he's returned to the drug game. Dennis explains he's trying to stay away from that. Grace, who seems a slight bit perturbed by his contacting her (though at the same time understanding of his situation), informs him that she is miles away from her old life. After an awkward silence Grace does say she might be able to get him in contact with a Church group that might be able to find him some work. Dennis appreciates the help but is also trying to reconnect with one of the few people he must have thought about for all those years in prison. I found the end of the conversation insightful, poignant, and incisively honest. I'll try my best to remember it from memory, but I am paraphrasing.
(As Grace opens the backseat of her car to place her briefcase, Dennis looks into the backseat to see a baby chair.)
DENNIS: So what's the name of your kid?
GRACE: Allen.
DENNIS: After Iverson?
GRACE: No. (Grace laughs slightly.) After his father.
DENNIS: Oh.
(Awkward Silence)
DENNIS: You know Grace ... seeing you like this ... after all these years ... well, looking at you ... it hurts.
GRACE: Well, then don't look.
(Grace enters her car and drives away.)
I have thoroughly and utterly ripped off this idea of a Quotes Post from the Sage-man. Sage writes a wonderful blog filled with evocative stories from his past and present. Sage is also a voracious reader like many of the blog buddies I frequent. A few weeks back he came up with the ingenius idea of a post filled with quotes from the books he was reading. I am now going to "borrow" this idea, lol. In fact, I will have a post sometime next week with quotes from the school books that I am reading. Unfortunately, I'm not reading anything non-school related at this time. I am however watching a good amount of TV though. Some of it actually good, lol. "THE WIRE" is clearly something I adore and I thought the best way to share its power would be by paraphrasing a this conversation.
This conversation needs some context so I'll quickly describe the situation. It revolves around the character Dennis "Cutty" Wise. Dennis just completed a 15 year stint in prison for the manslaughter of a rival drug dealer. Something that was simply part of his job as muscle for one of Baltimore's major drug crews. Released from prison he seems to be a changed man, but has trouble finding work. Living in his grandmother's basement, he's trying to stay away from the drug trade. With few options, he tries to track down his old girlfriend. He does so, only to find her living a different, quiet life as a speech teacher in the suburbs. He's removed the mothballs from his suit and catches his old girlfriend, Grace, as she reaches her car on the school parking lot. Wearing the suit, Grace assumes he's returned to the drug game. Dennis explains he's trying to stay away from that. Grace, who seems a slight bit perturbed by his contacting her (though at the same time understanding of his situation), informs him that she is miles away from her old life. After an awkward silence Grace does say she might be able to get him in contact with a Church group that might be able to find him some work. Dennis appreciates the help but is also trying to reconnect with one of the few people he must have thought about for all those years in prison. I found the end of the conversation insightful, poignant, and incisively honest. I'll try my best to remember it from memory, but I am paraphrasing.
(As Grace opens the backseat of her car to place her briefcase, Dennis looks into the backseat to see a baby chair.)
DENNIS: So what's the name of your kid?
GRACE: Allen.
DENNIS: After Iverson?
GRACE: No. (Grace laughs slightly.) After his father.
DENNIS: Oh.
(Awkward Silence)
DENNIS: You know Grace ... seeing you like this ... after all these years ... well, looking at you ... it hurts.
GRACE: Well, then don't look.
(Grace enters her car and drives away.)
Comments and Nude Pics
I'm still not sure what is going on with the comments. On some posts it seems non-beta bloggers can comment with their profile pic and a link to their profile. But other comments seem to have been made using the "other user" or "anonymous" feature. Sometimes a post shows both types of comments. I just want to say that I'm not sure if Blogger has implemented any kind of fix to the beta/non-beta problem. Anyway, I'd just like to apologize with the commenting problems and I hope they get fixed soon. For my previous post on the beta/non-beta comment problem, click here.
Also, tomorrow I am going to post some nude pics. Actually they are just topless pics of my hairy belly. I'm going to document my return to being in shape. Something I've posted about previously, lol. And, clearly, I want attention. So if you happen to view this blog from work, you may want to skip viewing it tomorrow. Unless you want your co-workers swarming your cubicle to ogle my exquisite hairy belly.
Also, tomorrow I am going to post some nude pics. Actually they are just topless pics of my hairy belly. I'm going to document my return to being in shape. Something I've posted about previously, lol. And, clearly, I want attention. So if you happen to view this blog from work, you may want to skip viewing it tomorrow. Unless you want your co-workers swarming your cubicle to ogle my exquisite hairy belly.
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
Go Yankees!
It's the Baseball Playoffs, aka the only time to watch baseball. Hah. I'm just joking. Okay maybe not. Anyway I'm rooting for the Yankees like I have since junior high. I'm no bandwagon Bob, buddy. I was there during the Mattingly years when crazy, ol' Steinbrenner made him shave those sideburns. Hey George!? Would you like to see some real sideburns? Give me a week and I'll have muttonchops as thick as shag carpeting. Hmm, that actually sounds very sexy. And like Puff Padre says, I must preserve my sexy. Yes ladies, I am available.
Anyway, even though I am a Bay Area native I was born in Queens and lived there for a year. Whatever, that's enough for me to claim the Yankees in junior high. And I haven't looked back. Seriously, who would. I mean we have the Jeter and a gazillion dollar payroll. It ain't fair.
If you're following the playoffs, drop me your predictions. I'm going with the Yankees and Twins in the AL (though Oaktown will be tough now that they stole one from Johan). And with the Cards and Dodgers in the NL.
Anyway, even though I am a Bay Area native I was born in Queens and lived there for a year. Whatever, that's enough for me to claim the Yankees in junior high. And I haven't looked back. Seriously, who would. I mean we have the Jeter and a gazillion dollar payroll. It ain't fair.
If you're following the playoffs, drop me your predictions. I'm going with the Yankees and Twins in the AL (though Oaktown will be tough now that they stole one from Johan). And with the Cards and Dodgers in the NL.
Slate mini-Rundown
Let's face it, I'm in love with Slate. One of the first columns to completely engross me was "Supreme Court Dispatches". In this column, the sharp and witty Dahlia Lithwick summarizes and analyzes (for the layman) important court cases in front of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court just kicked off its docket so for anyone even remotely interested in the cases that the High Court will decide, check out Lithwick's first dispatch for the current session.
I'm not sure how many of you are familiar with Alan Dershowitz, but the Harvard Law Professor is a great legal mind. Yes, as a famous defense attorney we may not like some of his previous clients, but the man makes thought provoking arguments. He has a new book out titled Preemption: A Knife That Cuts Both Ways. In Slate, Dershowitz has published an open-letter to the Guardian (the british newspaper) refuting an erroneous review/critique of his book. The review of the book seems to be so skewed, it ascribes opinions to Dershowitz that are in fact the complete opposite of his opinions laid out in the book. To me, it seems the Guardian reviewer did not even read the book. Now I read the Guardian from time to time and have cited it in school papers. But this seems to be an instance of European lefty bias. Either that or ginormous incompetence. Perhaps a little bit of both. In the past I've posted about numerous right-wing biased information (from the Bush Administration, FOX News, the GOP, etc). But it is only fair that I point out lefty bias as well and condemn it. Anyway, for those interested, check out Dershowitz's letter, it's a pretty short read.
Are you familiar with Hedge-Funds? I'm not. All I know is that they are risky but sometimes make a crapload of money. Well, thanks to Slate's Henry Blodget, I've learned a little bit more about Hedge-Funds and how a recent fund lost $6 billion dollars in a few weeks. That's right, billion. It's a very interesting read, check it out.
And, of course, this isn't a very good week for Republicans. Rep. Mark Foley made sexual remarks to underaged Congressional Pages over instant messages. The first IM political scandal, lol. Seriously, this is why no one should trust politicians and we seriously need political reform. Politicians are either corrupt, bigots, or dirty old men (or all three). Anyway, for those interested Slate has posted one of the IM conversations in question. It's pretty pervy knowing that it is a 50-something Congressman and a high school kid. But I'm sorry, it's also a bit hilarious at just how creepy the lines are from Foley. I mean he asks the kid to measure his penis. Perhaps the funniest and most tragic aspect of this scandal is that Mark Foley was chairman of the House caucus on missing and exploited children. Man, do I hate politicians.
I'm not sure how many of you are familiar with Alan Dershowitz, but the Harvard Law Professor is a great legal mind. Yes, as a famous defense attorney we may not like some of his previous clients, but the man makes thought provoking arguments. He has a new book out titled Preemption: A Knife That Cuts Both Ways. In Slate, Dershowitz has published an open-letter to the Guardian (the british newspaper) refuting an erroneous review/critique of his book. The review of the book seems to be so skewed, it ascribes opinions to Dershowitz that are in fact the complete opposite of his opinions laid out in the book. To me, it seems the Guardian reviewer did not even read the book. Now I read the Guardian from time to time and have cited it in school papers. But this seems to be an instance of European lefty bias. Either that or ginormous incompetence. Perhaps a little bit of both. In the past I've posted about numerous right-wing biased information (from the Bush Administration, FOX News, the GOP, etc). But it is only fair that I point out lefty bias as well and condemn it. Anyway, for those interested, check out Dershowitz's letter, it's a pretty short read.
Are you familiar with Hedge-Funds? I'm not. All I know is that they are risky but sometimes make a crapload of money. Well, thanks to Slate's Henry Blodget, I've learned a little bit more about Hedge-Funds and how a recent fund lost $6 billion dollars in a few weeks. That's right, billion. It's a very interesting read, check it out.
And, of course, this isn't a very good week for Republicans. Rep. Mark Foley made sexual remarks to underaged Congressional Pages over instant messages. The first IM political scandal, lol. Seriously, this is why no one should trust politicians and we seriously need political reform. Politicians are either corrupt, bigots, or dirty old men (or all three). Anyway, for those interested Slate has posted one of the IM conversations in question. It's pretty pervy knowing that it is a 50-something Congressman and a high school kid. But I'm sorry, it's also a bit hilarious at just how creepy the lines are from Foley. I mean he asks the kid to measure his penis. Perhaps the funniest and most tragic aspect of this scandal is that Mark Foley was chairman of the House caucus on missing and exploited children. Man, do I hate politicians.
Monday, October 02, 2006
FRONTLINE and NOVA
It's the start of the new TV Season and PBS is no exception. While PBS doesn't follow a strict season like the commercial networks, tomorrow the people's network will kick off the new season of NOVA ScienceNow and FRONTLINE. Many of you are probably familiar with NOVA, the excellent science program. Well ScienceNow is simply a version with an engaging astrophysicist host that tackles a few science related stories and interviews and profiles in a very didactic way.
While I adore NOVA, it is FRONTLINE that I simply cannot live without. This is the preeminent news documentary program on the planet! And by planet I mean the United States because I'm an ugly, arrogant American (natch). Words cannot express the impact FRONTLINE has had on me as a person. Each FRONTLINE program tackles a news story, a political or social issue in exacting detail. FRONTLINE will simply blow you away. If you are at all curious, please watch. And if tomorrow's topic doesn't interest you, check out the website for upcoming and previous episodes. FRONTLINE tackles an exhaustive range of issues. The FRONTLINE website is beyond superb, many episodes can be seen in their entirety and each episode has its own sub-website.
The season premiere of FRONTLINE is titled "Return of the Taliban" and deals with the lawless Paki-Afghan region that seems to be under Taliban control. Instead of paraphrasing, here's the exact episode summary from the website:
While I adore NOVA, it is FRONTLINE that I simply cannot live without. This is the preeminent news documentary program on the planet! And by planet I mean the United States because I'm an ugly, arrogant American (natch). Words cannot express the impact FRONTLINE has had on me as a person. Each FRONTLINE program tackles a news story, a political or social issue in exacting detail. FRONTLINE will simply blow you away. If you are at all curious, please watch. And if tomorrow's topic doesn't interest you, check out the website for upcoming and previous episodes. FRONTLINE tackles an exhaustive range of issues. The FRONTLINE website is beyond superb, many episodes can be seen in their entirety and each episode has its own sub-website.
The season premiere of FRONTLINE is titled "Return of the Taliban" and deals with the lawless Paki-Afghan region that seems to be under Taliban control. Instead of paraphrasing, here's the exact episode summary from the website:
"FRONTLINE reports from the lawless Pakistani tribal areas along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border and reveals how the area has fallen under the control of a resurgent Taliban militia. Despite the presence of 80,000 Pakistani troops, the Taliban and their supporters continue to use the region as a launching pad for attacks on U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan. Off limits to U.S. troops by agreement with Pakistan's president and long suspected of harboring Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri, the area is now considered a failed state. President Pervez Musharraf tells FRONTLINE reporter Martin Smith that Pakistan's strategy, which includes cash payments to militants who lay down their arms, has clearly foundered. In a region little understood because it is closed to most observers, FRONTLINE investigates a secret front in the war on terror."
Sunday, October 01, 2006
Recommendations
I'm not a major horror fan, but as a huge "The X-Files" fan I thoroughly enjoy creepy stories told with style, intelligence, and suspense. I'm also lucky enough to have a local PBS station that broadcasts excellent short films from around the world. One such short, THE TEN STEPS, tells a creepy, suspenseful story. If anyone is curious you can watch it over at AtomFilms, it's about 10 minutes.
Also, I've been recently listening to "Hands Clean" by Alanis Morissette. I think it's a few years old but since I'm an old dude who doesn't keep up with music, it's new to me. I must say I'm a fan of the Alanis. I'm not that familiar with her songs but I believe she writes most of them herself and I find them original (for pop songs) and I must say she has a singular, melodic voice. Anyway, check it out on YouTube if you'd like.
Also, I've been recently listening to "Hands Clean" by Alanis Morissette. I think it's a few years old but since I'm an old dude who doesn't keep up with music, it's new to me. I must say I'm a fan of the Alanis. I'm not that familiar with her songs but I believe she writes most of them herself and I find them original (for pop songs) and I must say she has a singular, melodic voice. Anyway, check it out on YouTube if you'd like.
Thursday, September 28, 2006
TV Corner
Anyone see "Heroes" on NBC? I caught the second half of it and I'll catch the first half on either the sci-fi network or as an NBC rerun. But I was pleasantly surprised. I thought it would be some silly, half-assed teen soap with superheroes. Though even teen soaps with superheroes are sometimes decent (okay, I used to watch "Smallville" --- it was pretty good for the seasons I watched --- don't judge me! lol). Anyway, "Hereos" is actually a steady, intriguing drama with some real suspense and intelligence. The story isn't completely far fetched and it is building nicely. Of course, I've only seen the second half of the first episode, but I think the show definitely has potential. Anyway, I'll return to it after I have seen a few more episodes. If anyone else caught it, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Also, I saw the second episode of "Studio 60" and I must say it wasn't bad. But the ending "skit" was not funny. Though I must admit the episode got a few laughs from me before then. I'm still interested in the depiction of the network bosses and so far it has been intriguing. But I'm thinking the show will stop short of true veracity. But, it has only been two episodes, so there is a good chance I could be wrong.
Also, I saw the second episode of "Studio 60" and I must say it wasn't bad. But the ending "skit" was not funny. Though I must admit the episode got a few laughs from me before then. I'm still interested in the depiction of the network bosses and so far it has been intriguing. But I'm thinking the show will stop short of true veracity. But, it has only been two episodes, so there is a good chance I could be wrong.
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
Things that annoy me:
1. Jared from Subway.
Look man, I'm glad you lost a gazillion pounds by eating subways sandwiches. And I'm glad you like to eat sammmaches (lol, I stole this from South Park, though I'm not the biggest South Park fan). But let's get real. You were a gazillion pounds man. Just cutting out meals 25 through 100 would have slimmed you down from ginormousity.
2. Zach Braff
I like Scrubs. Well, sometimes the jump cut from silly fart joke to morbid introspection doesn't always work for me --- sometimes I just don't buy it, but whatever. Anyway, this guy is leaving Scrubs to focus on films. That's all fine and dandy, but he's also going to focus on making films because if you haven't heard, GARDEN STATE was "a big, life-affirming, state-of-the-union address for twentysomethings." That's of course a quote from Zach Braff himself. I guess we should thank him for informing us of this, just in case we watch his film and not come to the same conclusion. I think we also could go without the Braff complaining about gossip and being the male Paris Hilton on Letterman. You are the male Paris Hilton you pudgy nitwit. Anyway I hate this guy. Luckily I'm not alone, Slate's Josh Levin speaks the truth.
4. Howard Stern
I've disliked Stern for a long time because let's see, he's base, slimy, and a hypocrite. Anyway this turd might be back to the radio airwaves because satellite radio hasn't been all that successful for him or his employer. A NY Post writer broke the story then had to give up his reporting duties for the rag when Stern had a hissyfit over it. Radar has the scoop. And this just in, Radar is back and as sharp as ever. Welcome back Radar Magazine!
5. That I have a belly
I'm working on this though. But I still can't get over how I was actually in decent shape only to get lazy and now I have to work my way back. It's funny but I thought I'd be able to return to a nice flat belly in a month or so. I've been working out about 4 days a week for 3 weeks and lost 3 lbs. From a trusted nutrition/exercise website I've read that at best someone who is technically overweight can shed 2 lbs a week. But that entails cardio 6 or 7 times a week and at least 3 days of weights. I'm doing 4 days of cardio and 2 days of weights. I still need to lose like 6 or 7 lbs so I guess it will be another 6 or 7 weeks until the belly returns to being fit and trim. Sorry folks, but I'm not confident enough to post pictures of my current belly status. Maybe I'll post pics of the trim belly, but that will just make me sad and ball up in the fetal position and cry. Lol. I'm so gay. That or a teenage girl. Whatever. If anyone else is shedding some lbs or getting back in shape, hope things are going well for you.
Look man, I'm glad you lost a gazillion pounds by eating subways sandwiches. And I'm glad you like to eat sammmaches (lol, I stole this from South Park, though I'm not the biggest South Park fan). But let's get real. You were a gazillion pounds man. Just cutting out meals 25 through 100 would have slimmed you down from ginormousity.
2. Zach Braff
I like Scrubs. Well, sometimes the jump cut from silly fart joke to morbid introspection doesn't always work for me --- sometimes I just don't buy it, but whatever. Anyway, this guy is leaving Scrubs to focus on films. That's all fine and dandy, but he's also going to focus on making films because if you haven't heard, GARDEN STATE was "a big, life-affirming, state-of-the-union address for twentysomethings." That's of course a quote from Zach Braff himself. I guess we should thank him for informing us of this, just in case we watch his film and not come to the same conclusion. I think we also could go without the Braff complaining about gossip and being the male Paris Hilton on Letterman. You are the male Paris Hilton you pudgy nitwit. Anyway I hate this guy. Luckily I'm not alone, Slate's Josh Levin speaks the truth.
4. Howard Stern
I've disliked Stern for a long time because let's see, he's base, slimy, and a hypocrite. Anyway this turd might be back to the radio airwaves because satellite radio hasn't been all that successful for him or his employer. A NY Post writer broke the story then had to give up his reporting duties for the rag when Stern had a hissyfit over it. Radar has the scoop. And this just in, Radar is back and as sharp as ever. Welcome back Radar Magazine!
5. That I have a belly
I'm working on this though. But I still can't get over how I was actually in decent shape only to get lazy and now I have to work my way back. It's funny but I thought I'd be able to return to a nice flat belly in a month or so. I've been working out about 4 days a week for 3 weeks and lost 3 lbs. From a trusted nutrition/exercise website I've read that at best someone who is technically overweight can shed 2 lbs a week. But that entails cardio 6 or 7 times a week and at least 3 days of weights. I'm doing 4 days of cardio and 2 days of weights. I still need to lose like 6 or 7 lbs so I guess it will be another 6 or 7 weeks until the belly returns to being fit and trim. Sorry folks, but I'm not confident enough to post pictures of my current belly status. Maybe I'll post pics of the trim belly, but that will just make me sad and ball up in the fetal position and cry. Lol. I'm so gay. That or a teenage girl. Whatever. If anyone else is shedding some lbs or getting back in shape, hope things are going well for you.
Sunday, September 24, 2006
Weird Al is my hero
Mucho props to The Grumpy Owl for posting this first.
That has to be Seth Green right?
Also, there's a non-legal, psuedo-political hubbub over a parody of James Blunt's "You're Beautiful" that Weird Al recorded. He titled the parody "You're Pitiful" and while it's not on his CD (because of the hubbub) he did release it to the internets. Anyway, check out this NPR article on the controversy and Weird Al's homepage if you can't listen to the parody on the NPR page.
That has to be Seth Green right?
Also, there's a non-legal, psuedo-political hubbub over a parody of James Blunt's "You're Beautiful" that Weird Al recorded. He titled the parody "You're Pitiful" and while it's not on his CD (because of the hubbub) he did release it to the internets. Anyway, check out this NPR article on the controversy and Weird Al's homepage if you can't listen to the parody on the NPR page.
Saturday, September 23, 2006
I was wrong
I understand many of us from the TV generation have a love/hate relationship with the boob tube. But we do feel as though we are experts on the subject since we've spent a good deal of time with it. I'm clearly no different. So when ABC stated they would move "Grey's Anatomy" to 9pm on Thursday, pitting it mano-a-mano with the ratings juggarnaut that is the original "CSI", I felt (as an expert) that I should opine on the matter. And what was my "expert" opinion? Basically that while GA is a solid show, it probably doesn't have enough male viewers to compete with CSI. Well, I was wrong. In their first match-up of the new tv season, GA not only was able to compete but brought in 3 million more viewers than CSI. And GA killed in the 18-49 demo which is what the networks really care about.
There's no gender breakdown of the ratings and while I'm pretty sure more women and gays watch the program than men, there must be a significant male viewership for the show pull in these big ratings numbers.
Anyway, I was wrong. Sorry about that GA and congrats on the ratings win. I wonder if the season premiere of LOST does as well? I would like it to, but it has been losing viewers so I highly doubt it will pull similar numbers.
There's no gender breakdown of the ratings and while I'm pretty sure more women and gays watch the program than men, there must be a significant male viewership for the show pull in these big ratings numbers.
Anyway, I was wrong. Sorry about that GA and congrats on the ratings win. I wonder if the season premiere of LOST does as well? I would like it to, but it has been losing viewers so I highly doubt it will pull similar numbers.
Friday, September 22, 2006
Thursday TV Rundown
"My Name is Earl" was funny as usual, but "The Office" was beyond hysterical. "The Office" episode revolved around the accidental outing of a gay employee and the hilarity that ensued. Seriously people, you need to watch this show. And I'm sorry but I'm a little tired of Jim and Pam now. How long are they seriously going to drag this out for? Though Jim's new workplace was pretty funny. Who else caught the Ed Helms sighting?
Also, if you can't get enough of "The Office" --- check out Slate's article on 4 international versions (the original British, the US, the French, and the German). It's an interesting read.
I watched "Grey's Anatomy" and as much as I want to cut it down to size, I have admit it was pretty good. Well except for the 1 billionth time the hospital had incoming patients with freaky medical problems --- this time it was the plague. Anyway, the rest of the program was skillfully done. The flashbacks were poignant, especially theAddison/Derek flashback which was then cleverly juxtaposed with Derek's present enlightenment (if not epiphiny). But if Squeaky McSlutty (I kid, I kid) doesn't hop on board the Derek train, I'm going to have a hard time buying it. Man, I can't believe I'm talking about GA like this. I'm totally gay. Or a 13 year-old girl.
I also watched "Shark". It was pretty decent and I'll probably watch it again but I'm not sure I'd recommend it to those that were not already curious about it.
Also, if you can't get enough of "The Office" --- check out Slate's article on 4 international versions (the original British, the US, the French, and the German). It's an interesting read.
I watched "Grey's Anatomy" and as much as I want to cut it down to size, I have admit it was pretty good. Well except for the 1 billionth time the hospital had incoming patients with freaky medical problems --- this time it was the plague. Anyway, the rest of the program was skillfully done. The flashbacks were poignant, especially theAddison/Derek flashback which was then cleverly juxtaposed with Derek's present enlightenment (if not epiphiny). But if Squeaky McSlutty (I kid, I kid) doesn't hop on board the Derek train, I'm going to have a hard time buying it. Man, I can't believe I'm talking about GA like this. I'm totally gay. Or a 13 year-old girl.
I also watched "Shark". It was pretty decent and I'll probably watch it again but I'm not sure I'd recommend it to those that were not already curious about it.
Did you know ...
This is the 80s/90s edition.
Did you know that "Blossom" (Mayim Bialik) is currently pursuing a PhD in Neuroscience at UCLA? Well, she is. Apparently she's working on solving several mysteries like the cure for brain cancer and how did Blossom get on television.
Did you know that Evie from "Out of this World" is still hot and still acting? Maureen Flannigan's (Evie) last role was on the FX Series "Starved".
Did you know the actor who plays Bernard from LOST also played Principal Willis Dewitt on "Growing Pains"? Yes, I'm both proud and ashamed that this was the first thought in my head when Bernard first shows up on LOST.
Did you know that "Blossom" (Mayim Bialik) is currently pursuing a PhD in Neuroscience at UCLA? Well, she is. Apparently she's working on solving several mysteries like the cure for brain cancer and how did Blossom get on television.
Did you know that Evie from "Out of this World" is still hot and still acting? Maureen Flannigan's (Evie) last role was on the FX Series "Starved".
Did you know the actor who plays Bernard from LOST also played Principal Willis Dewitt on "Growing Pains"? Yes, I'm both proud and ashamed that this was the first thought in my head when Bernard first shows up on LOST.
Thursday, September 21, 2006
Taxi Cab Confession
If you're new to this blog, let me tell you a little about myself. I enjoy Slate and I enjoy NPR. Speaking of NPR, the other day I was able to catch a CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) lecture by an insightful IR expert on his recent trip to Iran. He was of Iranian descent himself and therefore was able to easily chat up the local people. To end his lecture he mentioned a conversation he had with an Iranian cabbie. I'd like to share that anecdote with the blogosphere:
I'm paraphrasing but this is the gist of it.
The IR Expert was heading for a lecture and was studiously going over his notes in the back of the cab. The Cabbie, an extrovert, began to pepper him with questions about his nationality and the work he was here to do. After finding out the IR Expert was American and en route to a lecture and discussion on US/Iran/World relations, the Cabbie became very talkative. The Cabbie started out by saying the US was a bit of a bully on the world stage but that the Iranian government was rampantly bullying its own people. The Cabbie began to barrage the Iranian government with a string of non-stop curses. After a while, the IR Expert could no longer take the Cabbie's boisterousness and asked the Cabbie to tone it down and let him study his notes. The Cabbie complied. After a few minutes the Cabbie began to speak again, but in softer, calmer tone. He asked the IR Expert if he liked melon (by which he basically means a sweet honeydew type melon). And the IR Expert said yes. Then the Cabbie asked the IR Expert if he likes honey (which is usually eaten warm or hot in Iran). Once again the IR Expert said yes. The Cabbie responded with the warning that while both melon and honey are very enjoyable one shouldn't eat them together because something sweet and something hot eaten together will cause an upset stomach. This is apparently a very old wives' tale in Iran (the IR Expert explains to his lecture audience). And after mentioning the wives' tale the Cabbie says that the melon/honey mixture is akin to the mixture of politics and religion; that politics and religion do not mix and this is Iran's major problem.
Now the Cabbie might not be a medical expert but he has a very unique point of view. He lives in country ruled by a religious oligarchy. And he is strongly advocating a separation of Church/Mosque/Temple and State.
This is not to say that religion isn't important, nor that religion should not be protected by a legitimate government. But, they are two separate entities and there's a good reason why the great forefathers of this nation choose to keep them separate.
I'm paraphrasing but this is the gist of it.
The IR Expert was heading for a lecture and was studiously going over his notes in the back of the cab. The Cabbie, an extrovert, began to pepper him with questions about his nationality and the work he was here to do. After finding out the IR Expert was American and en route to a lecture and discussion on US/Iran/World relations, the Cabbie became very talkative. The Cabbie started out by saying the US was a bit of a bully on the world stage but that the Iranian government was rampantly bullying its own people. The Cabbie began to barrage the Iranian government with a string of non-stop curses. After a while, the IR Expert could no longer take the Cabbie's boisterousness and asked the Cabbie to tone it down and let him study his notes. The Cabbie complied. After a few minutes the Cabbie began to speak again, but in softer, calmer tone. He asked the IR Expert if he liked melon (by which he basically means a sweet honeydew type melon). And the IR Expert said yes. Then the Cabbie asked the IR Expert if he likes honey (which is usually eaten warm or hot in Iran). Once again the IR Expert said yes. The Cabbie responded with the warning that while both melon and honey are very enjoyable one shouldn't eat them together because something sweet and something hot eaten together will cause an upset stomach. This is apparently a very old wives' tale in Iran (the IR Expert explains to his lecture audience). And after mentioning the wives' tale the Cabbie says that the melon/honey mixture is akin to the mixture of politics and religion; that politics and religion do not mix and this is Iran's major problem.
Now the Cabbie might not be a medical expert but he has a very unique point of view. He lives in country ruled by a religious oligarchy. And he is strongly advocating a separation of Church/Mosque/Temple and State.
This is not to say that religion isn't important, nor that religion should not be protected by a legitimate government. But, they are two separate entities and there's a good reason why the great forefathers of this nation choose to keep them separate.
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
The West Wing is back.
So I made it back from class just in time to check out "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip" on NBC. This new drama revolves around an SNL-like show. It's also created (and produced, natch) by Aaron Sorkin who gave us the first several years of "The West Wing". I enjoyed and was an avid viewer of the first couple seasons of "The West Wing" but I was also a less discriminating viewer back then. I'll most likely watch the next few episodes of "Studio 60" but I doubt I'll become an avid viewer because the show seems to be a rehash of "The West Wing". For those who enjoy Sorkin's fast paced dialogue and his cast of either impudent or pseudo-quirky characters, this show is right up your alley. For me, most of his work is 45% cliche and 45% sentiment, with 10% of real, refreshing, original merit.
The setting of a Hollywood tv show, Sorkin's own backyard, may better play to his strengths. Though the show is mainly about the professional and personal relationships of those who inhabit the fictional Studio 60. Which isn't all that different from the relationships of those who inhabit a fictional White House or Sports Network (Sorkin also created "Sports Night"). Nevertheless, a tv show setting brings with it the chance for autobiography and we seem to be getting some of that with the two main characters. Matthew Perry and Bradley Whitford play a critically acclaimed, edgy comedic writer/director duo. Sorkin and director Thomas Schlamme have received similar notoriety (though as tv show creators, not comedians) since they paired together on "Sports Night". In the pilot for "Studio 60" the director portion of the duo (Whitford) fails a drug test for cocaine. Just a few years ago Sorkin infamously battled with his addiction to cocaine. I wonder if the rest of the show, especially the politics, decision making, and motivations of the network brass, will keep with this type of honesty.
Unfortunately, much of "Studio 60" feels like "The West Wing" deja vu. There's even a political left/right rift in one of the couplings. Matthew Perry's character recently split up with one of the castmembers of "Studio 60" (Sarah Paulson, who was great on DEADWOOD) who also happens to lean a little right when it comes to her Christian faith.
And one of the main obstacles I think Sorkin and his writing team will have, is simply to be funny. Just take a look at SNL. It's hard enough for SNL to be consistently funny. And now a tv drama about a fictional SNL type show is going to try its hand at it? Good luck.
And after all this badmouthing from me, the pilot was enjoyable enough and there is much potential. Unfortunately, I don't think this show will reach it.
The setting of a Hollywood tv show, Sorkin's own backyard, may better play to his strengths. Though the show is mainly about the professional and personal relationships of those who inhabit the fictional Studio 60. Which isn't all that different from the relationships of those who inhabit a fictional White House or Sports Network (Sorkin also created "Sports Night"). Nevertheless, a tv show setting brings with it the chance for autobiography and we seem to be getting some of that with the two main characters. Matthew Perry and Bradley Whitford play a critically acclaimed, edgy comedic writer/director duo. Sorkin and director Thomas Schlamme have received similar notoriety (though as tv show creators, not comedians) since they paired together on "Sports Night". In the pilot for "Studio 60" the director portion of the duo (Whitford) fails a drug test for cocaine. Just a few years ago Sorkin infamously battled with his addiction to cocaine. I wonder if the rest of the show, especially the politics, decision making, and motivations of the network brass, will keep with this type of honesty.
Unfortunately, much of "Studio 60" feels like "The West Wing" deja vu. There's even a political left/right rift in one of the couplings. Matthew Perry's character recently split up with one of the castmembers of "Studio 60" (Sarah Paulson, who was great on DEADWOOD) who also happens to lean a little right when it comes to her Christian faith.
And one of the main obstacles I think Sorkin and his writing team will have, is simply to be funny. Just take a look at SNL. It's hard enough for SNL to be consistently funny. And now a tv drama about a fictional SNL type show is going to try its hand at it? Good luck.
And after all this badmouthing from me, the pilot was enjoyable enough and there is much potential. Unfortunately, I don't think this show will reach it.
Sunday, September 17, 2006
Triumph in Canada
Triumph the Insult Comic Dog may the funniest thing to ever grace this planet. If you have never seen the Westminster Dog Show clips or the Star Wars Fans clip, then listen carefully. Stop what you are doing. Go to YouTube or Google Video and find these clips. Find them now! And watch them!
For those of you that have already ... check out Triumph in Canada (7min):
For those of you that have already ... check out Triumph in Canada (7min):
Slate Rundown
I cannot say enough good things about HBO's THE WIRE. Neither can Slate, calling it the best show on television.
FOX News deservedly gets criticized for its use of verbal bullies and ignorant sensationalism. However CNN's Nancy Grace is guilty of the same behavior in her tabloid treatment of headline criminal cases (Scott Peterson, Gary Condit, Elizabeth Smart). In a recent incident, the woman of a missing toddler committed suicide a few hours before the CNN airing of her taped interview with Nancy Grace. Now I am not implying Grace's rough interview with the woman directly caused the suicide. Also, the woman was a suspect in the case. Nevertheless, the sharp Dahlia Lithwick mentions the incident to spotlight her apt criticism of Grace's rampant prosecutorial tabloidism and Grace's disregard for the legal process. It is a great read.
Speaking of Lithwick, she also penned an informative piece on the current debate over legislating foreign detainee interrogation guidelines. The key battle is over the definition of torture with the Bush Administration wanting "shocks the conscience" while the Senate opposition (including major Republicans) wants to adopt the exact text of the Geneva Conventions ("outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment"). In a speech last week, Bush argued the "shocks the conscience" definition would be more clear and exact. As Lithwick skillfully explains, that's clearly not the case. Would the Bush Administration lie about their reasons for wanting their definition? I'm so shocked.
Speaking of Republican liars, Congressman Bob Ney pleaded guilty to corruption charges stemming from the Jack Abramoff scandal. Ney will be doing jailtime (27 months) and pay a hefty fine (up to $500k).
This is not to say that the Democrats don't have liars or corrupt politicians. They have plenty. When the story first broke about Dem Congressman William Jefferson's corruption scandal I posted on it. I think it reflects our sad political state that he is still under investigation. Though there was a big hubbub over an executive branch agency investigating a legislative branch official. Of course is all executive branch agenices are forbidden to investigate, who's going to do it?
Another major figure in the Abramoff scandel is GOP Senator Conrad Burns (R-Montana) who took $150k from Abramoff. Burns is in a heated race with Dem John Tester. Burns also has a YouTube vid of him napping at a Senate hearing and likes to disparage firefighters and his Guatemalan illegal, house painter (scroll to the bottom). After all this, there's still a chance he might remain a US Senator. Montana, why do you make it so hard to like you? Lol.
And in Slate's continuing dispatch from Fashion Week: Yes, the Fashion Professionals know that what's fashionable can make the average woman not look so great. "You have to be able to convince people that it looks good even when it doesn't. … These shapeless, boxy tops over leggings can make an average American woman look horrible, but everyone's gonna buy it."
FOX News deservedly gets criticized for its use of verbal bullies and ignorant sensationalism. However CNN's Nancy Grace is guilty of the same behavior in her tabloid treatment of headline criminal cases (Scott Peterson, Gary Condit, Elizabeth Smart). In a recent incident, the woman of a missing toddler committed suicide a few hours before the CNN airing of her taped interview with Nancy Grace. Now I am not implying Grace's rough interview with the woman directly caused the suicide. Also, the woman was a suspect in the case. Nevertheless, the sharp Dahlia Lithwick mentions the incident to spotlight her apt criticism of Grace's rampant prosecutorial tabloidism and Grace's disregard for the legal process. It is a great read.
Speaking of Lithwick, she also penned an informative piece on the current debate over legislating foreign detainee interrogation guidelines. The key battle is over the definition of torture with the Bush Administration wanting "shocks the conscience" while the Senate opposition (including major Republicans) wants to adopt the exact text of the Geneva Conventions ("outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment"). In a speech last week, Bush argued the "shocks the conscience" definition would be more clear and exact. As Lithwick skillfully explains, that's clearly not the case. Would the Bush Administration lie about their reasons for wanting their definition? I'm so shocked.
Speaking of Republican liars, Congressman Bob Ney pleaded guilty to corruption charges stemming from the Jack Abramoff scandal. Ney will be doing jailtime (27 months) and pay a hefty fine (up to $500k).
This is not to say that the Democrats don't have liars or corrupt politicians. They have plenty. When the story first broke about Dem Congressman William Jefferson's corruption scandal I posted on it. I think it reflects our sad political state that he is still under investigation. Though there was a big hubbub over an executive branch agency investigating a legislative branch official. Of course is all executive branch agenices are forbidden to investigate, who's going to do it?
Another major figure in the Abramoff scandel is GOP Senator Conrad Burns (R-Montana) who took $150k from Abramoff. Burns is in a heated race with Dem John Tester. Burns also has a YouTube vid of him napping at a Senate hearing and likes to disparage firefighters and his Guatemalan illegal, house painter (scroll to the bottom). After all this, there's still a chance he might remain a US Senator. Montana, why do you make it so hard to like you? Lol.
And in Slate's continuing dispatch from Fashion Week: Yes, the Fashion Professionals know that what's fashionable can make the average woman not look so great. "You have to be able to convince people that it looks good even when it doesn't. … These shapeless, boxy tops over leggings can make an average American woman look horrible, but everyone's gonna buy it."
Friday, September 15, 2006
Ummmmm ...
Apparently there's a new exercise machine that's sweeping the world or perhaps parts of Asia or perhaps simply parts of cyberspace. One is called igallop while another is called joba. Both are exercise machines that simulate horseback riding. I kid you not. All I have to say is that you ladies are really into your "electronic devices".
YouTube has a clip of the igallop's infomercial. For the curious and those in search of a laugh.
Thursday, September 14, 2006
POV - Waging a Living
The other day I saw a sharp documentary on PBS's POV series. Titled "Waging a Living" the documentary profiled and followed 4 single parents working at or near minimum wage. The federal minimum wage has not been increased in 10 years. Back in 1996 President Clinton allowed States to set their own minimum wage above the federal level. So far, **19 States have done so. Measured for inflation, the current federal minimum wage ($5.15 an hour in 2005 dollars) is considerably less that it was in 1968 ($9.12 an hour in 2005 dollars). (For the record, the minimum wage's inflation adjusted purchasing power was at its peak in 1968.) The documentary shows the viewer on an intimate, personal level just how difficult it is to survive on or near the minimum wage. And as important, the documentary highlights just how Kafkaesque the government assistance programs can be. In one case, as a single mother excelled at her job and received a raise. Only to have her much needed assistance cut back. In the end her raise cost her $100 per month. She decided to shift to part-time and focus on her college career. Yes, this single mother completed her Associate's Degree while working full time and taking care of her 5 children. There are other poignant, heartfelt (and heart wrenching) moments in this skillful documentary. For those interested, visit the website and check when it will be rebroadcast in your area.
As for the minimum wage, I do not see why it cannot be tied to inflation. Or at the least update each year (or each non-recession year). Though I understand a strict minimum wage for all 50 States is not the best solution as different states have varying living conditions. Perhaps the best scenario would be an individual minimum wage for each Metropolitan Area. I know many cities and regions have "living wages" but I have just learned that living wages only affect (or should I use 'effect' here?) companies with contracts to the local government.
In any case, this documentary spotlights just how important the minimum wage issue truly is.
**EDIT: I first stated 14 States had increased their minimum wage. This was sourced from Wikipedia. I have changed it to 19 States after reading the interview with Barbara Ehrenreich on the "Waging a Living" website.
As for the minimum wage, I do not see why it cannot be tied to inflation. Or at the least update each year (or each non-recession year). Though I understand a strict minimum wage for all 50 States is not the best solution as different states have varying living conditions. Perhaps the best scenario would be an individual minimum wage for each Metropolitan Area. I know many cities and regions have "living wages" but I have just learned that living wages only affect (or should I use 'effect' here?) companies with contracts to the local government.
In any case, this documentary spotlights just how important the minimum wage issue truly is.
**EDIT: I first stated 14 States had increased their minimum wage. This was sourced from Wikipedia. I have changed it to 19 States after reading the interview with Barbara Ehrenreich on the "Waging a Living" website.
Tuesday, September 12, 2006
Slate Rundown
Emily Yoffe, who writes both Slate's advice column and Human Guinea Pig (in which she tries out different jobs, skills, opportunities, etc), has a great current Human Guinea Pig column in which she decides to follow the Dog Whisperer and reign in her family dog (did I use the correct "reign" here?).
It's Fashion Week. Slate usually has a few cool pieces on the event. This year they sent their TV columnist, the metrosexual and funny Troy Patterson (I thought he was gay until he mentioned his recent wedding or engagement) to report on what all the hoopla is about. He didn't find the models sexy. I tell you my gaydar is never wrong!
In today's edition of Slate's 'today's papers' column, two very interesting new studies were flagged.
The first is a Baylor University survey on God and religion. It came up with some interesting conclusions. Most Americans have basically 4 ideas of God's personality. There's the Authoritarian God, the Benevolent God, the Critical God, and the Distant God. The study also points out that which type/idea of God one subscribes to tells a lot about that person's political and ideological views. It's pretty intriguing stuff and a good read.
The second is a study by Dr. Drew (from Loveline) that shows celebrities are (big shocker coming up) more narcissistic than the rest of us. Out of the celebrities surveyed, musicians were the least narcissistic and reality tv stars were the most narcissistic. Also, female celebs were more narcissistic than male celebs. However, in the general population males are more narcissistic than females. If you have the time to answer 40 questions, you can find out your narcissistic quotient here. The survey seems a bit obvious to me, I hope this wasn't what they used in the study. Whatever though.
It's Fashion Week. Slate usually has a few cool pieces on the event. This year they sent their TV columnist, the metrosexual and funny Troy Patterson (I thought he was gay until he mentioned his recent wedding or engagement) to report on what all the hoopla is about. He didn't find the models sexy. I tell you my gaydar is never wrong!
In today's edition of Slate's 'today's papers' column, two very interesting new studies were flagged.
The first is a Baylor University survey on God and religion. It came up with some interesting conclusions. Most Americans have basically 4 ideas of God's personality. There's the Authoritarian God, the Benevolent God, the Critical God, and the Distant God. The study also points out that which type/idea of God one subscribes to tells a lot about that person's political and ideological views. It's pretty intriguing stuff and a good read.
The second is a study by Dr. Drew (from Loveline) that shows celebrities are (big shocker coming up) more narcissistic than the rest of us. Out of the celebrities surveyed, musicians were the least narcissistic and reality tv stars were the most narcissistic. Also, female celebs were more narcissistic than male celebs. However, in the general population males are more narcissistic than females. If you have the time to answer 40 questions, you can find out your narcissistic quotient here. The survey seems a bit obvious to me, I hope this wasn't what they used in the study. Whatever though.
LOST!
I'm currently devouring LOST season 2 on DVD (thanks to netflix). I love this show. It's a wonderful, suspenseful, exciting story. The characters are superb, the interplay amongst them and their backstories make for very entertaining and interesting viewing. It's the rare tv show with genuine drama, therefore displaying great acting talents. And the larger concept of a mysterious island and its ultimate meaning will always keep you glued to the edge of your seat.
As I've mentioned before on this blog, I obtained my LOST addiction after season 2 had started. So I've been a trooper and waited for season 2 on DVD. Now it's here and I'm currently past the halway mark for season 2. Anyway, you can bet that I will finish viewing season 2 before season 3 starts. Then I'll be all caught up with LOST and that means this blog will have frequent posts about LOST. Or that's the plan. Anyway, if any of you out there have yet to catch an episode of LOST, I strongly recommend viewing an episode. There's netflix of course, as well as iTunes (I think) and other avenues of official online viewing. I'm sure there are numerous ways to unofficially download episodes (through filesharing programs or torrents). So the moral of the post is: YOU MUST WATCH LOST! Lol.
As I've mentioned before on this blog, I obtained my LOST addiction after season 2 had started. So I've been a trooper and waited for season 2 on DVD. Now it's here and I'm currently past the halway mark for season 2. Anyway, you can bet that I will finish viewing season 2 before season 3 starts. Then I'll be all caught up with LOST and that means this blog will have frequent posts about LOST. Or that's the plan. Anyway, if any of you out there have yet to catch an episode of LOST, I strongly recommend viewing an episode. There's netflix of course, as well as iTunes (I think) and other avenues of official online viewing. I'm sure there are numerous ways to unofficially download episodes (through filesharing programs or torrents). So the moral of the post is: YOU MUST WATCH LOST! Lol.
Sunday, September 10, 2006
Meet Chad Vader
So I stumbled across these comedic shorts over on YouTube the other day. They're not super funny but they're funny enough. And there's a certain charm about an ongoing series of vids on a grocery store manager who happens to be Darth Vader's lesser known brother. I really like them and it's impressive work for what seems to be high school or college students. Anyway, hopefully you'll get a kick out of them as well.
Chad Vader - Episode 2
Chad Vader - Episode 3
Chad Vader - Episode 2
Chad Vader - Episode 3
Saturday, September 09, 2006
I think it might be fake ....
As you know by now I'm a big fan of Slate.com. However, I used to despise their advice column because the columnist gave fartingly incompetent advice. I think she now runs the advice column for Yahoo! Anyway, since the old columnist left, Slate's advice column has been superb thanks to Emily Yoffe (who took over). Yoffe doles out wise and practical advice, sprinkled with humor ever now and again.
Well, this brings me to this week's advice column in Slate. The first letter is a doozy. Here's the sub title for the week: "I love her, but she doesn't know I killed her father." It's an interesting (for lack of a better term) read and Yoffe gives solid advice. However, I think it just might be fake. What do you think? I mean how creepy is this guy to strike up a relationship with his childhood neighbor after what he did?!?!? And I'm not saying creepy freaks like this don't exist, but would such a creep actually send in a letter? Maybe I'm just upset this freak reads Slate, lol.
Well, this brings me to this week's advice column in Slate. The first letter is a doozy. Here's the sub title for the week: "I love her, but she doesn't know I killed her father." It's an interesting (for lack of a better term) read and Yoffe gives solid advice. However, I think it just might be fake. What do you think? I mean how creepy is this guy to strike up a relationship with his childhood neighbor after what he did?!?!? And I'm not saying creepy freaks like this don't exist, but would such a creep actually send in a letter? Maybe I'm just upset this freak reads Slate, lol.
Friday, September 08, 2006
The Environment, folks
If any of you are familiar with E.O. Wilson, the father of sociobiology (and a true renaissance man), you'll know he speaks from a vast knowledge of biology, ecology, and science in general. Well, Prof. Wilson has written a new book, The Creation: An Appeal to Save Life on Earth, in which he points out just how serious the issue of biodiversity (therefore the environment) truly is. The book is written as a series of letters to a Southern Baptist Minister. Wilson was raised a Baptist though he is now a "provisional deist" ("I'm willing to accept the possibility that there is some kind of intelligent force beyond our current understanding"). However, he understands that many Americans are religious and he calls out for the religious and the secular to join forces to tackle the incisive problems our planet is facing. Climate change is of course a major issue as the plethora of evidence shows (for a great NOVA doc on the subject check out "Dimming the Sun"). Along with climate change, E.O. Wilson points out how thanks to humankind the Earth is currently experiencing its 6th Mass Extinction. Biodiversity, which is the source of our lush, rich, and healthy planet, is facing another low point as thousands of species are dying out as humankind expands. Wilson and other scientists like James Hansen (NASA's top Climate Scientist --- who was basically censored by the Bush Admin) have been raising the flag that the environment is in trouble and we must do something. We should be proud that we are getting greener, but a concerted effort needs to be undertaken. Anyway, I hope that our government (as well as the governments of other nations) quickly realizes just how important this matter is.
Okay, that's probably not going to happen with the craptastic Bush Admin. Maybe the next administration will do something, lol. Though I don't really see Congress doing much on this issue either. Guess the environment is going down the toilet.
Okay, that's probably not going to happen with the craptastic Bush Admin. Maybe the next administration will do something, lol. Though I don't really see Congress doing much on this issue either. Guess the environment is going down the toilet.
Radar is back!
So RADAR magazine is back and they have some decent articles and tidbits up already. One piece of interest is a H-wood poll on such questions as biggest hack, worst actor to work with, and other fun stuff. The gist: Crowe and Lohan are nightmares, Brett Ratner is a hack, Michael Mann is crazy ... the poll seems to be gospel. Here's a link to it:
"Hollywood Confidential"
Also, Slate's wonderful business columnist has a succint piece on why Sumner Redstone (head of Viacom) is a cooky bastard envious of 40 and 50 year-olds. Here's the link:
"Why Tom Cruise Really Got Fired"
"Hollywood Confidential"
Also, Slate's wonderful business columnist has a succint piece on why Sumner Redstone (head of Viacom) is a cooky bastard envious of 40 and 50 year-olds. Here's the link:
"Why Tom Cruise Really Got Fired"
Google Video is my hero
So while I'm still mad at Google/Blogger for this whole Beta Blogger commenting fiasco, I must give them some props for delivering the goods. First the Microsoft training vids from Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant. And now the Conan O'Brien 1864 Baseball reenactors piece (the one that lame YouTube took down for some reason). Enjoy! (it's kinda long at 7 min)
Thursday, September 07, 2006
Conan + YouTube = Ghey!
Dunno why YouTube took down the Conan spot but that was totally lame YouTube ... totally man.
Slate Rundown
This may sound like a broken record, but I'm a big fan of Slate.com. I feel the Today's Papers (a summary of the 5 major newspapers) and Jurisprudence (law and legal matters) columns are essential reading. Slate also has superb business columns as well as great dispatches pieces and solid articles on basically everything current. Anyway, here are a couple article links on interesting news stories.
Many of you may remember the Duke Lacrosse/Stripper Rape story a couple of months back. Well if you are wondering what happened to the story, the Slate article has a superb summary on the major facts and why the story is no longer major news. The gist of it is that the prosecution's case is thin at best. The Stripper's story has been equivocal and she has changed it throughout the investigation. There is also strong evidence (time stamped digital photos and credit card reciepts) that place the alleged rapists away from the alleged bathroom in which the rape took place. And while the Stripper is responsible for what strongly seems to be fraudulent rape allegations, blame doesn't simply rest with her. As the Slate article points out, the police and district attorney in the case have pressed on with the rape allegations through incompetence, political sensationalism, and borderline deceit. The Slate article reports on all this by taking apart a recent NYTimes article on why the DA is going ahead with the case. It is a very interesting read, so for those interested here's the link:
http://www.slate.com/id/2148546/
Now, before I move on to the second Slate article, I'd like to mention a few things. While this seems to be an incident of a fraudulent rape victim, one can look up state and/or national crime statistics and find substantial cases of genuine rape. Crime and social data also point out that rape/sexual assualt is most likely underreported. And let's face it, rape is still a taboo subject which also disadvantages rape victims because of a despicable social stigma that we, once again, don't really talk about and confront. The point is, just because one victim may be a fake does not mean that rape/sexual assualt is not a major problem.
Second, I believe one of the greatest tragedies in this story is the misconduct and incompentence by the police and DA. As someone who is gearing up towards a legal education I am becoming more and more familiar with our justice system. And while I'm sure there are staunchly ethical and competent police officers and prosecutors, the more I learn about the problems of the judicial system the more I hear and read about police and prosecutors being incompetent, acting towards political benefit, stubbornly avoiding or rejecting contrary evidence, and other abuses of power. The silver lining is that these abuses were eventually caught and placed into the official record so I (and others) could learn from them. But it's still rather heartbreaking to relentlessly read about and hear about such travesties of justice.
I've written a decent amount. So I'll introduce the second article very succintly. Team USA recently lost to Greece in the FIBA championships. We did rebound and crushed Argentina in the Bronze Medal game (which we won again --- Bronze at the previous Olympics as well). Anyway, Rob Weintraub does a great job in explaining why we lost (mainly that International Basketball is slightly different from the NBA and that the rest of the world has gotten significantly better) and makes a insightful comparison to our showing in the recent World Cup. Here's the link to the article for those interested:
http://www.slate.com/id/2148903/
Many of you may remember the Duke Lacrosse/Stripper Rape story a couple of months back. Well if you are wondering what happened to the story, the Slate article has a superb summary on the major facts and why the story is no longer major news. The gist of it is that the prosecution's case is thin at best. The Stripper's story has been equivocal and she has changed it throughout the investigation. There is also strong evidence (time stamped digital photos and credit card reciepts) that place the alleged rapists away from the alleged bathroom in which the rape took place. And while the Stripper is responsible for what strongly seems to be fraudulent rape allegations, blame doesn't simply rest with her. As the Slate article points out, the police and district attorney in the case have pressed on with the rape allegations through incompetence, political sensationalism, and borderline deceit. The Slate article reports on all this by taking apart a recent NYTimes article on why the DA is going ahead with the case. It is a very interesting read, so for those interested here's the link:
http://www.slate.com/id/2148546/
Now, before I move on to the second Slate article, I'd like to mention a few things. While this seems to be an incident of a fraudulent rape victim, one can look up state and/or national crime statistics and find substantial cases of genuine rape. Crime and social data also point out that rape/sexual assualt is most likely underreported. And let's face it, rape is still a taboo subject which also disadvantages rape victims because of a despicable social stigma that we, once again, don't really talk about and confront. The point is, just because one victim may be a fake does not mean that rape/sexual assualt is not a major problem.
Second, I believe one of the greatest tragedies in this story is the misconduct and incompentence by the police and DA. As someone who is gearing up towards a legal education I am becoming more and more familiar with our justice system. And while I'm sure there are staunchly ethical and competent police officers and prosecutors, the more I learn about the problems of the judicial system the more I hear and read about police and prosecutors being incompetent, acting towards political benefit, stubbornly avoiding or rejecting contrary evidence, and other abuses of power. The silver lining is that these abuses were eventually caught and placed into the official record so I (and others) could learn from them. But it's still rather heartbreaking to relentlessly read about and hear about such travesties of justice.
I've written a decent amount. So I'll introduce the second article very succintly. Team USA recently lost to Greece in the FIBA championships. We did rebound and crushed Argentina in the Bronze Medal game (which we won again --- Bronze at the previous Olympics as well). Anyway, Rob Weintraub does a great job in explaining why we lost (mainly that International Basketball is slightly different from the NBA and that the rest of the world has gotten significantly better) and makes a insightful comparison to our showing in the recent World Cup. Here's the link to the article for those interested:
http://www.slate.com/id/2148903/
Blog Out!
The other day Sage posted about his travels through South Korea. In his post he relayed the story of the "Compassion Bell". It's a wonderful folk tale and can be found here (scroll to the bottom if you only have time for the short story). Sage has a great blog, so for those interested, be sure to check his blog from time to time.
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
commenting problems
I wrote in my beta blogger madness post that yall non-beta bloggers should have no problem commenting. I was wrong. My sincerest apologies.
However you can still comment but you'll have to use the "other" feature (or comment anonymously if you like) and enter in a name and (optionally) a blog link.
As far as Beta Blogger, I'd recommend waiting until more people have switched so that you don't have to deal with this beta/non-beta commenting schism. Beta is not too shabby however. You have access to more templates (I think) and the ability to have labels on your posts. There's also a customize template feature which allows you to add lists and other things to your sidebar (as well as a top and bottom bar) without editing the html (though by now most of us are pretty adept at editing template html).
Have a sold you on Beta Blogger? Lol, stupid Google/Blogger. Grrrrr.
However you can still comment but you'll have to use the "other" feature (or comment anonymously if you like) and enter in a name and (optionally) a blog link.
As far as Beta Blogger, I'd recommend waiting until more people have switched so that you don't have to deal with this beta/non-beta commenting schism. Beta is not too shabby however. You have access to more templates (I think) and the ability to have labels on your posts. There's also a customize template feature which allows you to add lists and other things to your sidebar (as well as a top and bottom bar) without editing the html (though by now most of us are pretty adept at editing template html).
Have a sold you on Beta Blogger? Lol, stupid Google/Blogger. Grrrrr.
Everyday
A few weeks back Lisa posted about a YouTube vid in which a young lady took a photograph of herself everyday for a couple years. Featured on today's YouTube homepage is similar vid in which one Noah Kalina took a picture of himself everyday for 6 years. The vid is set to some decent music but it's a long vid, almost 6 minutes. But it's worth it just to see the magical dance his hair does. Man, I miss my hair. Anyway, I believe young Noah is a photographer and I'm sure this vid has given him some decent pub. As I type this, his website (www.noahkalina.com) is down (probably overrun with hits).
Anyway, if anyone is interested here's a link to the vid.
Anyway, if anyone is interested here's a link to the vid.
Monday, September 04, 2006
Patty Griffin
If someone asked me to name the most beautiful song in the world and I had to pick just one song, it would be "Rain" by Patty Griffin. And the music video is just as beautiful. (I'm like so in love with YouTube.)
Sunday, September 03, 2006
ASSASSINS (1995)
So I just realized that most (if not all) of my film reviews are about decent (if not stellar) films. Back in the day, okay like last week, I used to watch crappy movies all the time on TV. Anyway, the other day I caught a movie that I thought had potential because of the writers involved. But, the movie turned out to be craptastic.
ASSASSINS (1995)
Rating: ** out of 5
You would think with the word “ass” not once, but twice in the title I would have steered clear of this juvenile action-thriller. But no, this clunker plodded along cable one night and I decided to check it out. Also, the screenplay was crafted (and I use that term lightly) by the Wachowski Bros. (THE MATRIX, V FOR VENDETTA) and Brian Helgeland (L.A. CONFIDENTIAL, MYSTIC RIVER), so please don’t judge me for thinking this movie had some potential. Stallone stars as Robert Rath, preeminent hit man with a heart (and some baggage), who only kills bad guys (probably), and who wants to get out of ‘the biz’. On his biggest job he finds the a-dorable surveillance hacker Julianne Moore who shares his solitude and affection for cats. Will he kill her? Will he fall for her? Will she trust him? You get the picture. Oh yeah, Antonio Banderas plays a crazy, competing hit man who tries to kill Stallone and Moore. I have no idea how such a silly screenplay could be penned by these screenwriters but recreational drugs might be one explanation.
ASSASSINS (1995)
Rating: ** out of 5
You would think with the word “ass” not once, but twice in the title I would have steered clear of this juvenile action-thriller. But no, this clunker plodded along cable one night and I decided to check it out. Also, the screenplay was crafted (and I use that term lightly) by the Wachowski Bros. (THE MATRIX, V FOR VENDETTA) and Brian Helgeland (L.A. CONFIDENTIAL, MYSTIC RIVER), so please don’t judge me for thinking this movie had some potential. Stallone stars as Robert Rath, preeminent hit man with a heart (and some baggage), who only kills bad guys (probably), and who wants to get out of ‘the biz’. On his biggest job he finds the a-dorable surveillance hacker Julianne Moore who shares his solitude and affection for cats. Will he kill her? Will he fall for her? Will she trust him? You get the picture. Oh yeah, Antonio Banderas plays a crazy, competing hit man who tries to kill Stallone and Moore. I have no idea how such a silly screenplay could be penned by these screenwriters but recreational drugs might be one explanation.
sonofa
So I login to blogger and see a message about blogger beta. I read a little about the beta, mainly that there are new features (customize templates, label posts, etc). New features you say?!? Sign me up! I'm brave enough to be a trend starter!
So it takes a few minutes but "they" move my blog to beta. I'm checking out some of the new features and things are going well. I make some minor changes and then decide to check out what the blog buddies are up to.
And that's when it hits me. Either blogger simply didn't mention it in their summary about beta or I simply glossed over it, but beta bloggers aren't signed in when they comment on non-beta blogs. So if I want to comment on one of your fabulous blogs I have to use the "other" button and enter my a name and blog link. Now I don't really mind this, well I do, but I can easily type two lines every time I have to comment. Well it is annoying, but I really don't have a choice. Stupid blogger.
By the by, you super fabulous non-beta bloggers should have no problems commenting on my (beta) blog. If you do, please leave a comment about it (if you can) or email me at (vitalfilm @ gmail). Thanks.
Well, I hope they turn this beta public soon enough so things return to normal.
So it takes a few minutes but "they" move my blog to beta. I'm checking out some of the new features and things are going well. I make some minor changes and then decide to check out what the blog buddies are up to.
And that's when it hits me. Either blogger simply didn't mention it in their summary about beta or I simply glossed over it, but beta bloggers aren't signed in when they comment on non-beta blogs. So if I want to comment on one of your fabulous blogs I have to use the "other" button and enter my a name and blog link. Now I don't really mind this, well I do, but I can easily type two lines every time I have to comment. Well it is annoying, but I really don't have a choice. Stupid blogger.
By the by, you super fabulous non-beta bloggers should have no problems commenting on my (beta) blog. If you do, please leave a comment about it (if you can) or email me at (vitalfilm @ gmail). Thanks.
Well, I hope they turn this beta public soon enough so things return to normal.
Saturday, September 02, 2006
Blog Out!
Check out plain simple english. Especially the current post which is part 5 of Buffy's (can her real name be Buffy?) "not so super model" (autobiographical?) series. Anyway, it's a wonderful read about determination, rejection, delusion, and I'm guessing a few other things as the series progresses. The parts are short and snappy and funny and honest. Enjoy!
PS - I hope everyone has a wonderful Labor Day Weekend!
PS - I hope everyone has a wonderful Labor Day Weekend!
Friday, September 01, 2006
More YouTube
Like every music video is on this place. And if not, some clever 12 year old has edited clips from a video game to the song you're looking for. (By the by, the song is "Reno Dakota" by The Magnetic Fields)
I just heard of Camera Obscura on NPR. They're a band from Glasgow with a unique sound. According to the interview a common theme in their songs is an upbeat tempo intertwined with "less than upbeat" lyrics. Anyway check out "Lloyd I'm Ready to be Heartbroken". It's a great song and the video kicks some ass as well.
And who doesn't like the Magnetic Fields? Marse is a big fan. And I've heard nothing but good stuff. I must say I'm becoming a bigger fan the more songs I listen to. Anyway, someone (I'm guessing a 14 year old in Taiwan or Belarus) put a 3D animation of the formation of a magnetised Galaxy Cluster to the tune of "No One Will Ever Love You" by The Magnetic Fields.
I just heard of Camera Obscura on NPR. They're a band from Glasgow with a unique sound. According to the interview a common theme in their songs is an upbeat tempo intertwined with "less than upbeat" lyrics. Anyway check out "Lloyd I'm Ready to be Heartbroken". It's a great song and the video kicks some ass as well.
And who doesn't like the Magnetic Fields? Marse is a big fan. And I've heard nothing but good stuff. I must say I'm becoming a bigger fan the more songs I listen to. Anyway, someone (I'm guessing a 14 year old in Taiwan or Belarus) put a 3D animation of the formation of a magnetised Galaxy Cluster to the tune of "No One Will Ever Love You" by The Magnetic Fields.
I'm Getting Old
So it doesn't help that I'm 27 and I still go to a 4 year college. It's a long story people ... that has to do with film studies and mental health and the x-files. It all comes back to the x-files --- remember that people. Anyway, so I frequent a campus with other students who technically could be 10 years younger than me. 10 friggin' years people! It's been a week of school so far and I already feel like the old man I am thanks to the newest in ladies fashion.
Okay, who decided we needed to revist the '80's? I mean some of the outfits are cute, but none of them are sharp and sexy. I'm sorry the '80s weren't sexy. They were about 99 Luft Ballons, snorting cocaine, and ALF. And now with the '80s back, does every single girl have to wear horizontal stripes? And don't get me started on leggings. I now have another reason to hate the Lohan. Does everyone wear leggings because of Lohan? That's just sad. I'm sorry. It is. And while I'm happy the low cut jeans are now gone, frankly the wrong people were wearing them (and I see enough belly in the mirror and mine has hair on it), does it have to progress to triangle leg, acid wash? One thing I will give props too are those high, wide belt/girdles. They make for a very nice figure.
And the boys, oh man, how can extra baggy still be in? It can't. I was cool when it ended. No more super baggy please. Or whatever, like I care.
In other news, apparently I am a 13 year old girl trapped in an old man's body. I've come to this conclusion because I've been listening to The Fray's "How to Save a Life" nonstop. It has a catchy tune and I even think the lyrics are decent. I first caught it on a rerun of "Scrubs" the other day. Then I heard it as promo music for the "Grey's Anatomy" premiere. And then when I searched for the music video on YouTube (my new most favoritest website) I found several "One Tree Hill" vids that clever 13 year olds have edited together with The Fray's "How to Save a Life". So I like crappy music. I also like The Dixie Chicks. Don't judge me! Here's a link to their "Not Ready to Make Nice" video.
And just to prove I'm spending too much time on YouTube and that 13 year old girls go crazy for "How to Save a Life" here's a vid of 3 girls and their "intrepretive dance" to the song. Be warned, I lasted like 30 seconds. (If you do click, check the comments, people are vicious, lol)
And more proof of my YouTube obsession. Here's a 17 year old boy who was born in Israel and came to the US 4 years ago. He does a kick-ass cover of "Not Ready to Make Nice".
Okay, who decided we needed to revist the '80's? I mean some of the outfits are cute, but none of them are sharp and sexy. I'm sorry the '80s weren't sexy. They were about 99 Luft Ballons, snorting cocaine, and ALF. And now with the '80s back, does every single girl have to wear horizontal stripes? And don't get me started on leggings. I now have another reason to hate the Lohan. Does everyone wear leggings because of Lohan? That's just sad. I'm sorry. It is. And while I'm happy the low cut jeans are now gone, frankly the wrong people were wearing them (and I see enough belly in the mirror and mine has hair on it), does it have to progress to triangle leg, acid wash? One thing I will give props too are those high, wide belt/girdles. They make for a very nice figure.
And the boys, oh man, how can extra baggy still be in? It can't. I was cool when it ended. No more super baggy please. Or whatever, like I care.
In other news, apparently I am a 13 year old girl trapped in an old man's body. I've come to this conclusion because I've been listening to The Fray's "How to Save a Life" nonstop. It has a catchy tune and I even think the lyrics are decent. I first caught it on a rerun of "Scrubs" the other day. Then I heard it as promo music for the "Grey's Anatomy" premiere. And then when I searched for the music video on YouTube (my new most favoritest website) I found several "One Tree Hill" vids that clever 13 year olds have edited together with The Fray's "How to Save a Life". So I like crappy music. I also like The Dixie Chicks. Don't judge me! Here's a link to their "Not Ready to Make Nice" video.
And just to prove I'm spending too much time on YouTube and that 13 year old girls go crazy for "How to Save a Life" here's a vid of 3 girls and their "intrepretive dance" to the song. Be warned, I lasted like 30 seconds. (If you do click, check the comments, people are vicious, lol)
And more proof of my YouTube obsession. Here's a 17 year old boy who was born in Israel and came to the US 4 years ago. He does a kick-ass cover of "Not Ready to Make Nice".
Thursday, August 31, 2006
LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE (2006)
Going in I was expecting a quirky masterpiece. And while it didn't live up to my incredibly high expectations, this film is truly worth the price of admission.
LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE (2006)
Rating: ****1/2 out of 5
What’s not to like in this gem of a film about an idiosyncratic, semi-dysfunctional family that ventures on a road trip. The baby of the family, 7 year-old Olive (Abigail Breslin), wins a shot at a regional children’s beauty pageant, and soon the entire family jumps into the VW Bus. While the screenplay is deftly written (especially for a debut), it is the outstanding cast that steals the show. Anchored by Breslin, who is remarkable as Olive, the cast portrays the dynamic, hot-and-cold relationships that are forged on the anvil of family. While the film may be a little light in some parts, there are poignant moments of real, visceral emotion. As Olive’s parents, Toni Collette and Greg Kinnear give wonderful performances; in my opinion both are underrated actors. Kinnear fluidly adds nuance to his caricature-like character when the screenplay calls for it. Collette brings life to a stressed out mom doing her best to keep her flock together. Steve Carell, a comedic genius as we all are aware, shows some major dramatic chops as Olive’s uncle. All in all, an enchanting film with a singular appreciation for what it means to be a family. Not to be missed.
LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE (2006)
Rating: ****1/2 out of 5
What’s not to like in this gem of a film about an idiosyncratic, semi-dysfunctional family that ventures on a road trip. The baby of the family, 7 year-old Olive (Abigail Breslin), wins a shot at a regional children’s beauty pageant, and soon the entire family jumps into the VW Bus. While the screenplay is deftly written (especially for a debut), it is the outstanding cast that steals the show. Anchored by Breslin, who is remarkable as Olive, the cast portrays the dynamic, hot-and-cold relationships that are forged on the anvil of family. While the film may be a little light in some parts, there are poignant moments of real, visceral emotion. As Olive’s parents, Toni Collette and Greg Kinnear give wonderful performances; in my opinion both are underrated actors. Kinnear fluidly adds nuance to his caricature-like character when the screenplay calls for it. Collette brings life to a stressed out mom doing her best to keep her flock together. Steve Carell, a comedic genius as we all are aware, shows some major dramatic chops as Olive’s uncle. All in all, an enchanting film with a singular appreciation for what it means to be a family. Not to be missed.
Couric Photoshopped; Me Next!
I'm guessing many of you already know about CBS photoshopping Katie Couric for their magazine The Watch. I think most of us know photoshopping is rampant in the celeb and fashion and ladies mags. But if you didn't, here's a prime example of it and how well it works. Katie looks hot in the photoshopped pic, lol.
Katie's Extreme Makeover? - TV Newser
Speaking of slimming down, I've decided I need to as well. I used to be in pretty decent shape but a lazy summer has turned me into skinny-belly man. And as irresistable a hairy belly is to you ladies, I need to this for myself. Lol, I was actually going to put up some topless pics as "BEFORE" photos but I have chickened out. Though I'll prolly post them once I return to my old shape, along with "AFTER" photos, natch. Anyway, if anyone else is thinking about getting back in shape and wants to blog about it with me, let me know. And by blog about it I mean a weekly or twice a month update on our exercising routine, watching what we eat, weight loss and slimming of the waist. And we'll keep each other motivated. If anyone is interested, let me know.
Katie's Extreme Makeover? - TV Newser
Speaking of slimming down, I've decided I need to as well. I used to be in pretty decent shape but a lazy summer has turned me into skinny-belly man. And as irresistable a hairy belly is to you ladies, I need to this for myself. Lol, I was actually going to put up some topless pics as "BEFORE" photos but I have chickened out. Though I'll prolly post them once I return to my old shape, along with "AFTER" photos, natch. Anyway, if anyone else is thinking about getting back in shape and wants to blog about it with me, let me know. And by blog about it I mean a weekly or twice a month update on our exercising routine, watching what we eat, weight loss and slimming of the waist. And we'll keep each other motivated. If anyone is interested, let me know.
Blog Out! Short Film Edition
The other day I caught these two short films on PBS. They are heavy on CGI and show how a handful of skilled digital craftspeople can produce something polished, exciting, and very impressive. The first, titled "PREY ALONE", is 15 minutes long and was completed in 2005. There's not much plot to this virtuoso car chase, but there's more breathtaking action in the short's 15 minutes than many Hollywood Studio movies. The second is the infamously titled "405". The 405 is perhaps the busiest highway in Southern California; trust me, you haven't witnessed traffic until you traverse the 405 at rush hour. Anyway, "405" (which was made all the way back in 2000) is a 5 minute short displaying a jumbo jet making an impromptu landing on the 405 highway. The highway has been evacuated except for two innocent bystanders. It's a funny short with incredible CGI skills on display.
Both are available online. So if you have time to spare, check them out:
PREY ALONE (highly recommended)
405 - The Movie
Both are available online. So if you have time to spare, check them out:
PREY ALONE (highly recommended)
405 - The Movie
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
Do it!
If you have some time on your hands, check out likebetter. The site basically shows you two images side by side and choose which one you like better. After several clicks a brain icon will turn pink to guess something about you.
I found this from Lisa's blog. It guessed Lisa was a guy. It guessed I was a girl. Stop laughing. It did correctly guess I was right handed, though with like only 10% of the population left handed I don't find this very impressive.
I will update as more guesses come about.
It guessed correctly that I attend college.
It guessed incorrectly on the boxers or briefs question.
I found this from Lisa's blog. It guessed Lisa was a guy. It guessed I was a girl. Stop laughing. It did correctly guess I was right handed, though with like only 10% of the population left handed I don't find this very impressive.
I will update as more guesses come about.
It guessed correctly that I attend college.
It guessed incorrectly on the boxers or briefs question.
Random Google Video
If you are a fan of the BBC version of "The Office" (I am, though I think the US version is a little funnier --- but I also saw the US version first) then check out these Microsoft Training Videos from their British Offices. You might want to hurry because YouTube took down their video feeds after Microsoft cried copyright.
Msoft Training Vid Part 1
Msoft Training Vid Part 2
Also, if you dare, check this one out. It's on the Top 10 list. And yes, I was fooled.
Msoft Training Vid Part 1
Msoft Training Vid Part 2
Also, if you dare, check this one out. It's on the Top 10 list. And yes, I was fooled.
Even Stephven
I think Stephen Colbert and Steve Carell are two of the funniest people on the planet. Back on The Daily Show they had a hilarious skit called "Even Stephven". Anyway, Steve's wife Nancy Walls was also on the show. For some reason I remember her as kind of chunky (as someone who is working on getting rid of some belly I probably shouldn't be judging) but it may have been because she was umm, preggers. Yeah, that's kind of bad on my part. Anyway, Steve and Nancy (yes I'm on first name basis) showed up at the Emmys and she looks hot. My apologies Mrs. Carell for thinking you were a chunkster. IMDb also had a pic of Stephen Colbert and his cute wife so I put that up as well.
Monday, August 28, 2006
A few thoughts on the Emmys
First off, what the hell was Simon Cowell wearing? I mean I'm a hairy guy but that open shirt/chest hair thing was beyond disturbing. Thanks Simon, you've now crushed my dream ... of having an erection before 2010.
Okay, Tony Shalhoub must be the most popular man in Hollywood to keep winning. I mean if it was his first win, then bypassing Steve Carell might be understandable. But this is like his 17th win in 19 nominations or something. I've seen the first few episodes of MONK. It's a decent show but it's no Dunder-Mifflin!?!?! Also, did yall check out Carell's wife Nancy Walls (also a former The Daily Show member) --- she was looking hot! They make a great couple.
At least Dunder-Mifflin won for Best Comedy Show. And it was good to see The Daily Show pick up another couple Emmys --- though no love for the Lord of Truthiness Stephen Colbert. Colbert's wife was hot too --- they also make a cute couple.
And I was glad to see My Name is Earl win some awards as well. Greg Garcia (writing) and Mark Buckland (directing) had the funniest acceptance speeches. I hear ya Greg, God took my hair too ... and that's just not cool.
Also glad to see Andre Braugher win. He was on one of the most edgy, smart, and compelling shows on television: Homicide: Life on the Streets. He was nominated twice for H:LOTS and one once. Simply a terrific actor.
I still think Will Arnett and Arrested Development got robbed, but maybe there aren't enough Emmy Awards to go around.
Anyway, what are your thoughts?
Okay, Tony Shalhoub must be the most popular man in Hollywood to keep winning. I mean if it was his first win, then bypassing Steve Carell might be understandable. But this is like his 17th win in 19 nominations or something. I've seen the first few episodes of MONK. It's a decent show but it's no Dunder-Mifflin!?!?! Also, did yall check out Carell's wife Nancy Walls (also a former The Daily Show member) --- she was looking hot! They make a great couple.
At least Dunder-Mifflin won for Best Comedy Show. And it was good to see The Daily Show pick up another couple Emmys --- though no love for the Lord of Truthiness Stephen Colbert. Colbert's wife was hot too --- they also make a cute couple.
And I was glad to see My Name is Earl win some awards as well. Greg Garcia (writing) and Mark Buckland (directing) had the funniest acceptance speeches. I hear ya Greg, God took my hair too ... and that's just not cool.
Also glad to see Andre Braugher win. He was on one of the most edgy, smart, and compelling shows on television: Homicide: Life on the Streets. He was nominated twice for H:LOTS and one once. Simply a terrific actor.
I still think Will Arnett and Arrested Development got robbed, but maybe there aren't enough Emmy Awards to go around.
Anyway, what are your thoughts?
Sunday, August 27, 2006
Conan! (and the emmys)
So I'm a big Conan O'Brien fan. I used to watch him religiously but now I'm an old man and I need my beauty sleep. Nonetheless, I'm still 100% with the Conester. I think his off-the-cuff comedy during interviews is beyond hilarious. And when he takes over for Leno in 2009 I'll prolly return to watching "The Tonight Show" (that, or I'll have a tivo/DVR and record every show). Anyway, NBC is hosting the Emmy Awards again and they've made the smart move or re-tapping the Cone-man for hosting duties. I think 2002 was the last time I actually watched the Emmys and it was because of the Conan. I think the Academy Awards are a craptastic popularity contest so you can easily deduce my opinion of the Emmys. Anyway, since I've been watching quite a bit more tv recently I'll probably be somewhat interested in who wins certain awards ... but let's face it, we're all going to watching Conan rock the room. Conan's been doing some press for the Emmys and here are two rather funny interviews:
conan o'brien interview at AV Club
conan o'brien interview at yahoo!tv
PS -- I'm going to have an emmy post up very soon.
conan o'brien interview at AV Club
conan o'brien interview at yahoo!tv
PS -- I'm going to have an emmy post up very soon.
The Emmys
From my earlier post (about Conan hosting) you can see that I don't put much stake into the Emmy Awards. One of the main reasons is that crappy shows get nominated and win. For the last couple years "THE WIRE" has been one of the best programs on television. And while they're not eligible this time around (they had no original programs to air in the 2005 season), they have a grand total of 1 Emmy nomination for 3 seasons of exemplar work. That the show has yet to receive an acting nomination is completely ludicrous. But the Emmys get even crazier. While I haven't watched an episode of "Gilmore Girls" in years, the first couple seasons (the ones I watched) were very solid, especially the acting by Lauren Graham. Graham has yet to be nominated and the show has a grand total of 1 nomination for make-up. Now I understand one criticism of a show like "Gilmore Girls" is that it is sentimental at times. Well, so is/was "The West Wing" which has racked up a gazillion nominations. And so is "Grey's Anatomy" which has plenty of nominations. Now I'm not suggesting "The West Wing" or "Grey's Anatomy" should not be nominated, they are both decent shows and deserve nominations but perhaps not the plehora they have received. To suggest that the acting in WW or GA is somehow more demanding or superior to the acting in GG (for the first couple seasons I watched anyway) is absurd. If you want to check out real acting try THE WIRE or LOST. Which brings me to LOST. I have yet to see the second season (it hits DVD in about a week), but even if it fell off by 50% from the first season it should have received a nomination or three. And I think I know why LOST has been basically shut out this time around. The powers-that-be at the Emmys probably like to give each network a nomination for the big awards, therefore spreading the nominations around. Or maybe all the actors and technicians that vote are voting only for shows on their own networks. I'm not exactly sure what it is, but it smells fishy --- I mean how the hell does "Two and a Half Men" get nominated (though maybe I should retain judgement until I've seen an episode). I understand the Emmy people used a new system for the nominations this year that were to bolster the newer and never-nominated contenders. Other than GA and "Two and a Half Men" I don't see that it has worked. Anyway, I guess I'll end my Emmy rant here and go on to some predictions:
Outstanding Comedy Series - It better be "Arrested Development" or "The Office"
Outstanding Drama Series - It will most likely be GA (which is a decent show) but I think House should get it. Though in reality this should go to THE WIRE --- I don't care if they are not eligible!
Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series - Steve Carell better win this, or the Emmys are fixed! And evil.
Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series - Will Arnett! Oh please Emmy Gods! Do the right thing!
Speaking of which, how the hell did "Arrested Development" not get more nominations?!?!?!?
Oh yeah, and I will end with another Emmy suggestion. Enlarge the number of nominations from 5 to 8 or 10. That way more shows and actors and directors/writers get justly nominated.
Okay, I'm done.
Okay, 1 more:
Outstanding Variety, Music Or Comedy Series - Colbert Report, Daily Show, Conan, or Letterman ... how Bill Maher got nominated is an outrage.
Outstanding Comedy Series - It better be "Arrested Development" or "The Office"
Outstanding Drama Series - It will most likely be GA (which is a decent show) but I think House should get it. Though in reality this should go to THE WIRE --- I don't care if they are not eligible!
Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series - Steve Carell better win this, or the Emmys are fixed! And evil.
Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series - Will Arnett! Oh please Emmy Gods! Do the right thing!
Speaking of which, how the hell did "Arrested Development" not get more nominations?!?!?!?
Oh yeah, and I will end with another Emmy suggestion. Enlarge the number of nominations from 5 to 8 or 10. That way more shows and actors and directors/writers get justly nominated.
Okay, I'm done.
Okay, 1 more:
Outstanding Variety, Music Or Comedy Series - Colbert Report, Daily Show, Conan, or Letterman ... how Bill Maher got nominated is an outrage.
Friday, August 25, 2006
OK Go
So first and foremost I'm a film and tv guy. I do love a good book and a good song, but they just don't take precedence. Especially music. In the car I listen to NPR and when I'm on public transit I'll crack open a book. This leaves very little time for music so it's no surprise I have no clue what all the kids are listening to. Which is totally cool with me because the kids are mostly dumb goofballs who probably listen to Jessica Simpson and Paris Hilton and other crap. I mean the children are the future. Okay, since I know very little about the current music scene there's really no way I'm aware of the musicians that are actually churning out decent music. Unless of course I'm introduced to this good music through NPR or a film or tv. A couple years back, NPR introduced me to HEM. If you haven't heard their enchanting folk-lullabies, you are missing out.
Anyway, this brings me to a recent episode of the omniscient "The Colbert Report". (Yes, I'm british or whoever are the people who place periods outside of quotation marks when the sentence doesn't include quoting someone.) Earlier this week one of the bandmembers from OK Go came on "The Colbert Report" and discussed their elegant, beautific, and graceful dance videos. These YouTube vids are extremely popular and you'll see why. Plus the songs are pretty rad. (Yes, I'm a brit from the '80s.) So this is how I found out about some great new music.
OK Go - Treadmill vid - "Here It Goes Again"
OK Go - Dancing in the backyard vid - "A Million Ways"
PS - the videos are choreographed by the lanky guy's sister
Anyway, this brings me to a recent episode of the omniscient "The Colbert Report". (Yes, I'm british or whoever are the people who place periods outside of quotation marks when the sentence doesn't include quoting someone.) Earlier this week one of the bandmembers from OK Go came on "The Colbert Report" and discussed their elegant, beautific, and graceful dance videos. These YouTube vids are extremely popular and you'll see why. Plus the songs are pretty rad. (Yes, I'm a brit from the '80s.) So this is how I found out about some great new music.
OK Go - Treadmill vid - "Here It Goes Again"
OK Go - Dancing in the backyard vid - "A Million Ways"
PS - the videos are choreographed by the lanky guy's sister
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Science Corner
So there's an astronomer's convention in Prague and one of the hot topics of debate is how should a planet be defined. The debate centers squarely on Pluto. One side considers Pluto a planet while the other side does not. If Pluto is a planet, then there are three other space bodies that will immediately be labeled as planets as well. However, this would define a planet as "any object larger than 500 miles in diameter that orbits the sun, has a mass roughly one-12,000th that of Earth and has enough self-gravity to pull itself into a round shape." Critics point out that this definition would most likely add other bodies and asteriods in our solar system.
Now, I understand I am thoroughly unqualified to opine on this debate. Nevertheless, my voice on the subject must be heard for I bring a Colbert level of truthiness!
I am totally with the side that wants to kick Pluto out of the planets clique. First of all, Pluto is smaller than our moon. And B, Pluto's so called moon Charon is roughly as big Pluto. Parte tres, Pluto and Charon both orbit a point in space that is between them ... they basically revolve around each other. Anyway, I just had to bring the truthiness out and call Pluto on its planet imposter status.
And now for your reading pleasure, a conversation overheard at the convention:
Astronomer #1: So I hear you consider Pluto to be a planet.
Astronomer #2: That's right. It's a round shape, at least 500 miles in diameter, and has an orbit.
Astronomer #1: Hmmm, is that right?
Astronomer #2: Oh, you betcha.
Astronomer #1: Well my balls are 500 miles in diameter and they orbit Uranus but you don't see me trying to get them labeled as planets, do ya?
Astronomer #2: Very clever butt-munch.
FIN
Now, I understand I am thoroughly unqualified to opine on this debate. Nevertheless, my voice on the subject must be heard for I bring a Colbert level of truthiness!
I am totally with the side that wants to kick Pluto out of the planets clique. First of all, Pluto is smaller than our moon. And B, Pluto's so called moon Charon is roughly as big Pluto. Parte tres, Pluto and Charon both orbit a point in space that is between them ... they basically revolve around each other. Anyway, I just had to bring the truthiness out and call Pluto on its planet imposter status.
And now for your reading pleasure, a conversation overheard at the convention:
Astronomer #1: So I hear you consider Pluto to be a planet.
Astronomer #2: That's right. It's a round shape, at least 500 miles in diameter, and has an orbit.
Astronomer #1: Hmmm, is that right?
Astronomer #2: Oh, you betcha.
Astronomer #1: Well my balls are 500 miles in diameter and they orbit Uranus but you don't see me trying to get them labeled as planets, do ya?
Astronomer #2: Very clever butt-munch.
FIN
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
I have discovered ...
The greatest television show in the world! It is ... "House MD" ... lol. Okay it's not the greatest, that title belongs to "The X-Files" (let's not argue people), but it is still pretty damn good. It's a refreshing, different take on a medical drama (especially when compared to ER, Chicago Hope, Grey's Anatomy, etc); the medical mystery makes for an intriguing plot. And I must admit the smarmy, arrogant, caustic Gregory House character (as played by the wonderful Hugh Laurie) makes for a very dynamic, always interesting show. I've only seen a handful of reruns on the USA network, but I am hooked and hopefully I can catch the previous seasons this way. Anyway, if any of you out are curious about "House MD" but have yet to view an episode, do yourself a favor and catch the next viewing ... you'll definitely enjoy it.
Monday, August 21, 2006
Media Test -- Updated
So last week I had a post entitled "Media Test" which linked to this internet video.
After viewing the video I asked the question: "Is this vid laughing at or laughing with preppies?"
Anyway, the point of the post was to run a little media literacy test because I strongly feel the video is BOTH laughing AT and laughing WITH preppies. And it is doing this because of the fact it is a marketing tool by the Smirnoff company for their new beverage "Raw Tea".
While I admit the mock video is funny (it has its moments), it seems rather sneaky and disingenuous for a multi-million dollar corporation to put together a slick mock music video commercial and try to pass it off as the product of some anonymous group (college kids or stand-ups or etc) who then uploaded the vid to the web. While Smirnoff is named numerous times in the video, there's no official logo or trademark to give the impression that the video is actually a commercial.
Now I understand most people will find this to be no big deal because we are bombarded by advertisements all the time. I think because we're already bombed with ads, it is important to know when we are watching something whose aim is truly comic or satiric and when we are watching something whose aim is commercial.
Which brings me to my last point. Is the vid really satiric? I personally do not think so. While the whole "preppie" as "gangsta" act is funny, as far as I can tell they both like to rap about their riches. The preppie rap lyrics go on to point out their "Ivy League education" and that their parents run the nation. And the video's "female talent" are basically interchangeable with any rap video --- the attire is the only difference. So while at first glance this may seem like a slight dig at preppies acting like gangstas, there's enough here to knowingly laugh with the type of preppies being portrayed. Now I'd like to point out here that being "preppie" isn't some kind of evil or bad thing or that every "preppie" likes to brag about being rich and feels their "kind" run the nation. It is just that this vid is doing both, laughing AT and WITH preppies.
Which I have to admit is excellent, sneaky, manipulative advertising.
After viewing the video I asked the question: "Is this vid laughing at or laughing with preppies?"
Anyway, the point of the post was to run a little media literacy test because I strongly feel the video is BOTH laughing AT and laughing WITH preppies. And it is doing this because of the fact it is a marketing tool by the Smirnoff company for their new beverage "Raw Tea".
While I admit the mock video is funny (it has its moments), it seems rather sneaky and disingenuous for a multi-million dollar corporation to put together a slick mock music video commercial and try to pass it off as the product of some anonymous group (college kids or stand-ups or etc) who then uploaded the vid to the web. While Smirnoff is named numerous times in the video, there's no official logo or trademark to give the impression that the video is actually a commercial.
Now I understand most people will find this to be no big deal because we are bombarded by advertisements all the time. I think because we're already bombed with ads, it is important to know when we are watching something whose aim is truly comic or satiric and when we are watching something whose aim is commercial.
Which brings me to my last point. Is the vid really satiric? I personally do not think so. While the whole "preppie" as "gangsta" act is funny, as far as I can tell they both like to rap about their riches. The preppie rap lyrics go on to point out their "Ivy League education" and that their parents run the nation. And the video's "female talent" are basically interchangeable with any rap video --- the attire is the only difference. So while at first glance this may seem like a slight dig at preppies acting like gangstas, there's enough here to knowingly laugh with the type of preppies being portrayed. Now I'd like to point out here that being "preppie" isn't some kind of evil or bad thing or that every "preppie" likes to brag about being rich and feels their "kind" run the nation. It is just that this vid is doing both, laughing AT and WITH preppies.
Which I have to admit is excellent, sneaky, manipulative advertising.
Saturday, August 19, 2006
What do they say about female drivers?
So if you're not a big sports fan there's a lovely young lady racing cars in the IRL. Her name is Danica Patrick and while she hasn't won a race she has won a pole, a top five finish, and rookie of the year. She's easy on the eyes and has done an FHM spread or cover, as well as a couple slightly cheesecake commercials selling car fluids or something --- all I remember from the commercials is her pouty, "did someone fart?" look into the camera, lol.
Anyway, while Danica has made many female firsts in the IRL, winning a pole was not one of them. That's because Sarah Fisher did that back in 2002. While Sarah is pretty, she doesn't have the model figure and good looks of Danica. And perhaps that's a reason why she didn't receive the same hype as Danica. Sarah's 4 year stint in the IRL ended in 2004 as she tried to make the move to NASCAR. Recently Sarah returned to race in the IRL on an open-contract for a race or two. There's talk she will return to the IRL for the 2007 season.
Anyway, the reason I am posting about this is not simply because it seems a bit unfair society/sports media/IRL fans went bat-guano insane for Danica while only going semi-crazy for Sarah (specifically in hype and funding). I'm posting because it seems the sports media is ready to ignite a feud between the two. Take for example this article (from which I have borrow quite a bit of info) which has no problem fanning the flames. However, there's a quote from Danica in 2004 (before Danica entered the IRL) which is hard to ignore: "[Fisher has] done some good things, but then there are some bad things. Like, she struggles, I think, with the racing part of it."
That's right folks, what a beeyaa--not a very nice person. I have no idea if Danica has apologized for that comment but whatever, it was a bad thing to say. I'm sure Sarah had plenty of men questioning her ability but for another female driver to do so, and one who had yet to enter the IRL at the time, it's enough to bring about hair-pulling fisticuffs. I kid, I kid, on the hair-pulling.
Anyway, while an IRL feud between two female drivers may seem a bit sexist (how many times will we hear "catfight" in articles), it might bring in a crapload of viewers. And as many have mentioned, one of NASCAR's popularity is the soap-operatic, at times petty squabbling between its drivers. And let's face it, NASCAR is pretty damn popular.
So I think these two ladies should start a running feud and try to get the better of each other on the track next season. Perhaps Team Sarah and Team Danica shirts are to follow.
Anyway, while Danica has made many female firsts in the IRL, winning a pole was not one of them. That's because Sarah Fisher did that back in 2002. While Sarah is pretty, she doesn't have the model figure and good looks of Danica. And perhaps that's a reason why she didn't receive the same hype as Danica. Sarah's 4 year stint in the IRL ended in 2004 as she tried to make the move to NASCAR. Recently Sarah returned to race in the IRL on an open-contract for a race or two. There's talk she will return to the IRL for the 2007 season.
Anyway, the reason I am posting about this is not simply because it seems a bit unfair society/sports media/IRL fans went bat-guano insane for Danica while only going semi-crazy for Sarah (specifically in hype and funding). I'm posting because it seems the sports media is ready to ignite a feud between the two. Take for example this article (from which I have borrow quite a bit of info) which has no problem fanning the flames. However, there's a quote from Danica in 2004 (before Danica entered the IRL) which is hard to ignore: "[Fisher has] done some good things, but then there are some bad things. Like, she struggles, I think, with the racing part of it."
That's right folks, what a beeyaa--not a very nice person. I have no idea if Danica has apologized for that comment but whatever, it was a bad thing to say. I'm sure Sarah had plenty of men questioning her ability but for another female driver to do so, and one who had yet to enter the IRL at the time, it's enough to bring about hair-pulling fisticuffs. I kid, I kid, on the hair-pulling.
Anyway, while an IRL feud between two female drivers may seem a bit sexist (how many times will we hear "catfight" in articles), it might bring in a crapload of viewers. And as many have mentioned, one of NASCAR's popularity is the soap-operatic, at times petty squabbling between its drivers. And let's face it, NASCAR is pretty damn popular.
So I think these two ladies should start a running feud and try to get the better of each other on the track next season. Perhaps Team Sarah and Team Danica shirts are to follow.
Wednesday, August 16, 2006
Random Stuff
So the other day Yahoo! News had a headline about men signing up for "Charm School" in order to woo the ladies. It's a curious read that doesn't really say much, but how can one not read about a "Charm School" (with a theory of attraction, no less --- though never explained) ... anyway, here's the link.
And for the record I was thinking about signing up but then I read how much it cost ... $1600 dollars. So I have a different plan. I'll take $1600 dollars and put it into my wallet. Then I'll head to a busy club and nonchalantly take out my now bulky wallet and act like I'm thumbing through it for something. The women and the gays will be on my like stupid on George Allen. Umm, because the women and the gays like money. Zing! Oh man, I'm so high-larious. Oh wait, I don't want the gays on me. Okay maybe I haven't thought this through.
Hah, I'm just joking around ladies. Saying women and the gays are only into money is a sexist stereotype. And as a proud feminist I would never do such a thing. Instead I'll tell women I'm sensitive, yet strong and that I watch "Grey's Anatomy". Lol.
For the record, I know of a few dudes that are so into money they actually gold dig (for lack of another term). This world is weird people, weird!
Anyway, TRANSFORMERS the live-action/CGI movie will be coming out next year. Michael Bay is the director so this might be crappy (I just checked out the writers and things don't seem good, though if this does turn out well it's good news for trekkies as this writing team is slated to write the next Trek film). Anyway, they have a teaser trailer up on the official website which doesn't really show much at all. But if you'd like to check it out here's the link.
Also, if you could help me out and leave a comment on the "Media Test" post below I would really appreciate it. Thanks!
And for the record I was thinking about signing up but then I read how much it cost ... $1600 dollars. So I have a different plan. I'll take $1600 dollars and put it into my wallet. Then I'll head to a busy club and nonchalantly take out my now bulky wallet and act like I'm thumbing through it for something. The women and the gays will be on my like stupid on George Allen. Umm, because the women and the gays like money. Zing! Oh man, I'm so high-larious. Oh wait, I don't want the gays on me. Okay maybe I haven't thought this through.
Hah, I'm just joking around ladies. Saying women and the gays are only into money is a sexist stereotype. And as a proud feminist I would never do such a thing. Instead I'll tell women I'm sensitive, yet strong and that I watch "Grey's Anatomy". Lol.
For the record, I know of a few dudes that are so into money they actually gold dig (for lack of another term). This world is weird people, weird!
Anyway, TRANSFORMERS the live-action/CGI movie will be coming out next year. Michael Bay is the director so this might be crappy (I just checked out the writers and things don't seem good, though if this does turn out well it's good news for trekkies as this writing team is slated to write the next Trek film). Anyway, they have a teaser trailer up on the official website which doesn't really show much at all. But if you'd like to check it out here's the link.
Also, if you could help me out and leave a comment on the "Media Test" post below I would really appreciate it. Thanks!
Monday, August 14, 2006
Media Test
Step 1 - Go view this web vid at youtube.
Step 2 - Please answer the following question:
"Is this vid laughing at or laughing with preppies?"
Step 2 - Please answer the following question:
"Is this vid laughing at or laughing with preppies?"
Sunday, August 13, 2006
Friday, August 11, 2006
AOL users are weird
So the other day some AOL employees posted a data set of nearly 37 million individual searches (made by about 650,000 members). That averages to like 56 searches per member. I'm not sure if 56 search entries can paint a picture of the user, but I'm sure it's fun trying. Anyway, Paul Boutin over at Slate has used the software of the startup company he works for to go over the searches and come up with 7 amorphous profiles. It's a very curious and interesting (and funny) read.
I guess I'm an Omnivore though I'm not sure that fits entirely because the majority of my searches are for film related sites. Anyway, it is a fun read. Click already!
I guess I'm an Omnivore though I'm not sure that fits entirely because the majority of my searches are for film related sites. Anyway, it is a fun read. Click already!
Thursday, August 10, 2006
Blog Out! - Non-Fiction
While I have a healthy books-to-read list (I'm currently on RIGHT AS RAIN by G. Pelecanos) I'm always on the lookout to add to the list. Thanks to a recent "Fresh Air "on NPR I came across The Wonga Coup by Adam Roberts. Here's a Seattle Times review of the book.
If you enjoy political and military thrillers, how about a non-fiction account of the attempted coup of the small African nation Equatorial Guinea ... by a group of about 100 Mercenaries employed by a group of well-to-do British/South African citizens. Yeah, when this story first broke in 2004 I had to do a double take on the Yahoo! News headline. From the few news articles I've read and the wonderful interview with author Adam Roberts on "Fresh Air" I've come to understand that the planners of the attempted coup basically considered it a get-even-richer scheme. The basic idea was to plant a native figurehead and stealthily steal the small nation's rich oil profits. The details and results of this ignominious exercise in arrogance and narcissism are interesting, laughable, and entertaining all at the same time. I hope I snag this book sooner than later ... it is going to make for one hell-of-a read.
If you enjoy political and military thrillers, how about a non-fiction account of the attempted coup of the small African nation Equatorial Guinea ... by a group of about 100 Mercenaries employed by a group of well-to-do British/South African citizens. Yeah, when this story first broke in 2004 I had to do a double take on the Yahoo! News headline. From the few news articles I've read and the wonderful interview with author Adam Roberts on "Fresh Air" I've come to understand that the planners of the attempted coup basically considered it a get-even-richer scheme. The basic idea was to plant a native figurehead and stealthily steal the small nation's rich oil profits. The details and results of this ignominious exercise in arrogance and narcissism are interesting, laughable, and entertaining all at the same time. I hope I snag this book sooner than later ... it is going to make for one hell-of-a read.
Monday, August 07, 2006
SLEEPY HOLLOW (1999)
Do you have a netflix queue? If you don't you should get one. Anyway I have one (as does your Grandma Ilene, so maybe you should look into one) and it's filled with a gazillion flicks I needed to see like yesterday. I'm pretty good with adding new films because they get advertised on the tele (hmm, first "queue" now "tele" --- the Brits are coming for their language ... I say over the center of my discolored dead body). But films from the past decade which I wanted to see when they first debuted but simply missed and now forgotten about ... well those films are a bit harder to queue up. However they do come on cable tv. Now I should really rent these films from netflix because tv shreds 10+ minutes to squeeze in enough commercials. But then I may simply forget again and let's face it, I can't say no to a good film. Which brings me to this lovely gem:
SLEEPY HOLLOW (1999)
Rating: ****1/2 out of 5
This gothic horror mystery simply has it all: a thrillingly entertaining plot, wonderfully creepy sets, superb acting, and a sprinkle of comedy for good measure. New York Constable Ichabod Crane (Depp), who places science before spirits, is called to Sleepy Hollow to investigate murders at the hand of what the townsfolk describe as a Headless Horseman. The direction is outstanding. Tim Burton has a lot going on simply from the plot; he adds an interesting dreamscape backstory and juggles everything splendidly onscreen. The visuals are fantastic, from the mesmerizing still that introduces the titles to the eerie, foggy Hollow that is a character in its own right. The film is more than simply plot as screenwriter Andrew Kevin Walker pens several clever, charming, and comedic lines. And the two leads seem to have a majestic time uttering them. Johnny Depp’s idiosyncratic Crane is simply a joy to watch. This one should not be missed.
SLEEPY HOLLOW (1999)
Rating: ****1/2 out of 5
This gothic horror mystery simply has it all: a thrillingly entertaining plot, wonderfully creepy sets, superb acting, and a sprinkle of comedy for good measure. New York Constable Ichabod Crane (Depp), who places science before spirits, is called to Sleepy Hollow to investigate murders at the hand of what the townsfolk describe as a Headless Horseman. The direction is outstanding. Tim Burton has a lot going on simply from the plot; he adds an interesting dreamscape backstory and juggles everything splendidly onscreen. The visuals are fantastic, from the mesmerizing still that introduces the titles to the eerie, foggy Hollow that is a character in its own right. The film is more than simply plot as screenwriter Andrew Kevin Walker pens several clever, charming, and comedic lines. And the two leads seem to have a majestic time uttering them. Johnny Depp’s idiosyncratic Crane is simply a joy to watch. This one should not be missed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)